ghsa-7p96-h955-3rjc
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 00:56
Modified
2022-05-17 00:56
VLAI Severity ?
Details
The dissect_pw_eth_heuristic function in epan/dissectors/packet-pw-eth.c in Wireshark 1.6.x before 1.6.13 and 1.8.x before 1.8.5 does not properly handle apparent Ethernet address values at the beginning of MPLS data, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (loop) via a malformed packet.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2013-1578"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2013-02-03T01:55:00Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "The dissect_pw_eth_heuristic function in epan/dissectors/packet-pw-eth.c in Wireshark 1.6.x before 1.6.13 and 1.8.x before 1.8.5 does not properly handle apparent Ethernet address values at the beginning of MPLS data, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (loop) via a malformed packet.",
"id": "GHSA-7p96-h955-3rjc",
"modified": "2022-05-17T00:56:22Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T00:56:22Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-1578"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8043"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A16205"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/trunk/epan/dissectors/packet-pw-eth.c?r1=46420\u0026r2=46419\u0026pathrev=46420"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc?view=revision\u0026revision=46420"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-02/msg00028.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-02/msg00037.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.wireshark.org/security/wnpa-sec-2013-01.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…