GHSA-7M8V-W6F9-Q2F9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 01:38 – Updated: 2022-11-03 19:12
VLAI
Summary
Cross-site Scripting in Jenkins Rebuilder Plugin
Details

A cross-site scripting vulnerability exists in Jenkins Rebuilder Plugin 1.28 and earlier in

RebuildAction/BooleanParameterValue.jelly,  
RebuildAction/ExtendedChoiceParameterValue.jelly,  
RebuildAction/FileParameterValue.jelly,  
RebuildAction/LabelParameterValue.jelly,  
RebuildAction/ListSubversionTagsParameterValue.jelly,  
RebuildAction/MavenMetadataParameterValue.jelly,  
RebuildAction/NodeParameterValue.jelly,  
RebuildAction/PasswordParameterValue.jelly,  
RebuildAction/RandomStringParameterValue.jelly,  
RebuildAction/RunParameterValue.jelly,  
RebuildAction/StringParameterValue.jelly,  
RebuildAction/TextParameterValue.jelly,  
RebuildAction/ValidatingStringParameterValue.jelly  

that allows users with Job/Configuration permission to insert arbitrary HTML into rebuild forms.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "com.sonyericsson.hudson.plugins.rebuild:rebuild"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.29"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2018-1000415"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-79"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2022-11-03T19:12:53Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2019-01-09T23:29:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A cross-site scripting vulnerability exists in Jenkins Rebuilder Plugin 1.28 and earlier in \n```\nRebuildAction/BooleanParameterValue.jelly,  \nRebuildAction/ExtendedChoiceParameterValue.jelly,  \nRebuildAction/FileParameterValue.jelly,  \nRebuildAction/LabelParameterValue.jelly,  \nRebuildAction/ListSubversionTagsParameterValue.jelly,  \nRebuildAction/MavenMetadataParameterValue.jelly,  \nRebuildAction/NodeParameterValue.jelly,  \nRebuildAction/PasswordParameterValue.jelly,  \nRebuildAction/RandomStringParameterValue.jelly,  \nRebuildAction/RunParameterValue.jelly,  \nRebuildAction/StringParameterValue.jelly,  \nRebuildAction/TextParameterValue.jelly,  \nRebuildAction/ValidatingStringParameterValue.jelly  \n```\nthat allows users with Job/Configuration permission to insert arbitrary HTML into rebuild forms.",
  "id": "GHSA-7m8v-w6f9-q2f9",
  "modified": "2022-11-03T19:12:53Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T01:38:17Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-1000415"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/jenkinsci/rebuild-plugin/commit/3a4ca33a45fa048c9ab7b7082f87e72c0df848cb"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://jenkins.io/security/advisory/2018-09-25/#SECURITY-130"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106532"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Cross-site Scripting in Jenkins Rebuilder Plugin"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…