ghsa-7f7f-v228-3845
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:26
Modified
2022-05-13 01:26
Details

Memory leak in Cisco IOS before 15.0(1)XA5 might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by sending a crafted SIP REGISTER message over UDP, aka Bug ID CSCtg41733.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2010-4683"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-772"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2011-01-07T19:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Memory leak in Cisco IOS before 15.0(1)XA5 might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by sending a crafted SIP REGISTER message over UDP, aka Bug ID CSCtg41733.",
  "id": "GHSA-7f7f-v228-3845",
  "modified": "2022-05-13T01:26:36Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:26:36Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-4683"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/64588"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/15_0/15_0x/15_01_XA/rn800xa.pdf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/45786"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…