GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-7CRX-7PFP-HG6J

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-13 18:31 – Updated: 2026-01-13 18:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/mlx5e: Avoid unregistering PSP twice

PSP is unregistered twice in: _mlx5e_remove -> mlx5e_psp_unregister mlx5e_nic_cleanup -> mlx5e_psp_unregister

This leads to a refcount underflow in some conditions: ------------[ cut here ]------------ refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free. WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1694 at lib/refcount.c:28 refcount_warn_saturate+0xd8/0xe0 [...] mlx5e_psp_unregister+0x26/0x50 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_nic_cleanup+0x26/0x90 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_remove+0xe6/0x1f0 [mlx5_core] auxiliary_bus_remove+0x18/0x30 device_release_driver_internal+0x194/0x1f0 bus_remove_device+0xc6/0x130 device_del+0x159/0x3c0 mlx5_rescan_drivers_locked+0xbc/0x2a0 [mlx5_core] [...]

Do not directly remove psp from the _mlx5e_remove path, the PSP cleanup happens as part of profile cleanup.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-68779"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-01-13T16:15:57Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet/mlx5e: Avoid unregistering PSP twice\n\nPSP is unregistered twice in:\n_mlx5e_remove -\u003e mlx5e_psp_unregister\nmlx5e_nic_cleanup -\u003e mlx5e_psp_unregister\n\nThis leads to a refcount underflow in some conditions:\n------------[ cut here ]------------\nrefcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.\nWARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1694 at lib/refcount.c:28 refcount_warn_saturate+0xd8/0xe0\n[...]\n mlx5e_psp_unregister+0x26/0x50 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5e_nic_cleanup+0x26/0x90 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5e_remove+0xe6/0x1f0 [mlx5_core]\n auxiliary_bus_remove+0x18/0x30\n device_release_driver_internal+0x194/0x1f0\n bus_remove_device+0xc6/0x130\n device_del+0x159/0x3c0\n mlx5_rescan_drivers_locked+0xbc/0x2a0 [mlx5_core]\n[...]\n\nDo not directly remove psp from the _mlx5e_remove path, the PSP cleanup\nhappens as part of profile cleanup.",
  "id": "GHSA-7crx-7pfp-hg6j",
  "modified": "2026-01-13T18:31:03Z",
  "published": "2026-01-13T18:31:03Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68779"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/35e93736f69963337912594eb3951ab320b77521"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e12c912f92ccea671b514caf371f28485714bb4b"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…