ghsa-6vw8-w3q3-4cmf
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 02:24
Modified
2025-04-12 13:06
Severity ?
Details
In Wireshark 2.2.0 to 2.2.1 and 2.0.0 to 2.0.7, the AllJoyn dissector could crash with a buffer over-read, triggered by network traffic or a capture file. This was addressed in epan/dissectors/packet-alljoyn.c by ensuring that a length variable properly tracked the state of a signature variable.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2016-9374", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-119", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2016-11-17T05:59:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "In Wireshark 2.2.0 to 2.2.1 and 2.0.0 to 2.0.7, the AllJoyn dissector could crash with a buffer over-read, triggered by network traffic or a capture file. This was addressed in epan/dissectors/packet-alljoyn.c by ensuring that a length variable properly tracked the state of a signature variable.", id: "GHSA-6vw8-w3q3-4cmf", modified: "2025-04-12T13:06:33Z", published: "2022-05-17T02:24:18Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-9374", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12953", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=a5770b6559b6e6765c4ef800e85ae42781ea4900", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;a=commit;h=a5770b6559b6e6765c4ef800e85ae42781ea4900", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.wireshark.org/security/wnpa-sec-2016-59.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3719", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94369", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037313", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.