ghsa-6q8v-2hvm-fx37
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-06-28 00:00
Modified
2022-08-15 20:10
Severity ?
Summary
Apache Tika contains incomplete fix for regex DoS
Details
The initial fixes in CVE-2022-30126 and CVE-2022-30973 for regexes in the StandardsExtractingContentHandler were insufficient, and we found a separate, new regex DoS in a different regex in the StandardsExtractingContentHandler. These are now fixed in 1.28.4 and 2.4.1.
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "Maven", "name": "org.apache.tika:tika" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "1.28.4" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] }, { "package": { "ecosystem": "Maven", "name": "org.apache.tika:tika" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "2.0.0" }, { "fixed": "2.4.1" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2022-33879" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2022-07-08T19:20:51Z", "nvd_published_at": "2022-06-27T22:15:00Z", "severity": "LOW" }, "details": "The initial fixes in CVE-2022-30126 and CVE-2022-30973 for regexes in the StandardsExtractingContentHandler were insufficient, and we found a separate, new regex DoS in a different regex in the StandardsExtractingContentHandler. These are now fixed in 1.28.4 and 2.4.1.", "id": "GHSA-6q8v-2hvm-fx37", "modified": "2022-08-15T20:10:01Z", "published": "2022-06-28T00:00:41Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-33879" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/wfno8mf5nlcvbs78z93q9thgrm30wwfh" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220812-0004" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/06/27/5" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ], "summary": "Apache Tika contains incomplete fix for regex DoS" }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.