ghsa-6q8v-2hvm-fx37
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-06-28 00:00
Modified
2022-08-15 20:10
Severity ?
Summary
Apache Tika contains incomplete fix for regex DoS
Details
The initial fixes in CVE-2022-30126 and CVE-2022-30973 for regexes in the StandardsExtractingContentHandler were insufficient, and we found a separate, new regex DoS in a different regex in the StandardsExtractingContentHandler. These are now fixed in 1.28.4 and 2.4.1.
{ affected: [ { package: { ecosystem: "Maven", name: "org.apache.tika:tika", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "0", }, { fixed: "1.28.4", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], }, { package: { ecosystem: "Maven", name: "org.apache.tika:tika", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "2.0.0", }, { fixed: "2.4.1", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], }, ], aliases: [ "CVE-2022-33879", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [], github_reviewed: true, github_reviewed_at: "2022-07-08T19:20:51Z", nvd_published_at: "2022-06-27T22:15:00Z", severity: "LOW", }, details: "The initial fixes in CVE-2022-30126 and CVE-2022-30973 for regexes in the StandardsExtractingContentHandler were insufficient, and we found a separate, new regex DoS in a different regex in the StandardsExtractingContentHandler. These are now fixed in 1.28.4 and 2.4.1.", id: "GHSA-6q8v-2hvm-fx37", modified: "2022-08-15T20:10:01Z", published: "2022-06-28T00:00:41Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-33879", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread/wfno8mf5nlcvbs78z93q9thgrm30wwfh", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220812-0004", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/06/27/5", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], summary: "Apache Tika contains incomplete fix for regex DoS", }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.