ghsa-6f79-g335-f9mf
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 01:00
Modified
2022-05-17 01:00
Details
The silc_channel_message function in ops.c in the SILC protocol plugin in libpurple in Pidgin before 2.10.1 does not perform the expected UTF-8 validation on message data, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a crafted message, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-3594.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2011-4603" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-20" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2011-12-17T03:54:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The silc_channel_message function in ops.c in the SILC protocol plugin in libpurple in Pidgin before 2.10.1 does not perform the expected UTF-8 validation on message data, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a crafted message, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-3594.", "id": "GHSA-6f79-g335-f9mf", "modified": "2022-05-17T01:00:09Z", "published": "2022-05-17T01:00:09Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-4603" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://hermes.opensuse.org/messages/13195955" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A18303" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://developer.pidgin.im/viewmtn/revision/diff/c7b95cc3be0590b52edc02d4750ae62844c1acb6/with/afb9ede3de989f217f03d5670cca00e628bd11f1/libpurple/protocols/silc/ops.c" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://developer.pidgin.im/viewmtn/revision/info/afb9ede3de989f217f03d5670cca00e628bd11f1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/47234" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.pidgin.im/news/security/?id=59" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-1820.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/51074" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.