GHSA-6CP8-V795-JR2J

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-26 21:53 – Updated: 2026-06-26 21:53
VLAI
Summary
Hackney has an infinite loop on non-token byte at start of an Alt-Svc entry
Details

Summary

CVE-2026-47066 is an infinite loop (CWE-835) in hackney's Alt-Svc response header parser (src/hackney_altsvc.erl). When an HTTP server returns an Alt-Svc header whose value begins with a non-token byte (e.g. !, @, =, ;), the parser enters a tight tail-recursive loop that pins an Erlang scheduler at 100% CPU and permanently hangs the calling connection process. Because the parser is invoked synchronously on every HTTP response, any attacker-controlled origin can trigger the hang with a single-byte header value.

Details

1. Parser dispatch

parse_and_cache/3 is called inside the hackney connection process on each HTTP response. It collects all Alt-Svc header values via collect_altsvc_headers/1, concatenates them, and passes the result to parse/1, which calls parse_entries(Header, []).

2. Failed token consumption

parse_entries/2parse_entry/1parse_protocol/1parse_token(Data, <<>>). The function parse_token/2 pattern-matches leading bytes: alphanumeric, -, _, whitespace, and comma all have explicit clauses. Any other byte (e.g. !) falls through to the catch-all:

parse_token(Rest, <<>>) -> {undefined, Rest}.

This returns the input unchanged — no byte is consumed.

3. No-progress loop

parse_entry propagates {undefined, Rest} back to parse_entries/2, which calls skip_comma(Rest). Because the first byte is not ,, skip_comma also returns Rest unchanged. parse_entries then recurses with the identical buffer:

parse_entries(Data, Acc)  % Data identical to previous iteration

Erlang tail recursion never preempts on a pure CPU loop, so the scheduler is pinned and the process never yields or returns.

4. Root cause

parse_entries/2 has no guard that detects zero-byte progress after a failed parse_entry call and no fallback to advance past the offending byte.

PoC

  1. Start an HTTP server that responds with the header Alt-Svc: ! (any single non-token byte suffices).
  2. Issue any HTTP GET request via hackney to that server: erlang hackney:request(get, "http://attacker.example/", [], <<>>, [])
  3. Observe that the call never returns; the Erlang scheduler hosting the connection process is pinned at 100% CPU indefinitely.

Alternatively, call the parser directly: hackney_altsvc:parse(<<"!">>) — the process hangs immediately.

Impact

Denial of service via unbounded CPU consumption. Any application using hackney 2.0.0-beta.1 through 4.0.0 that connects to attacker-controlled HTTP endpoints is affected. No authentication is required; a single response header byte is sufficient to hang the connection process. Fixed in hackney 4.0.1. CVSS v4.0 score: 8.7 (HIGH).

Resources

  • Introduction commit: https://github.com/benoitc/hackney/commit/408e5fe20302226ea8c74dde2bcbd452d712b5b2
  • Patch commit: https://github.com/benoitc/hackney/commit/e548aba1f97ffa3f4750da7b772998fb78c01894
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Hex",
        "name": "hackney"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.0.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-47066"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-835"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-26T21:53:07Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-25T15:16:21Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\n[CVE-2026-47066](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-47066) is an infinite loop (CWE-835) in hackney\u0027s Alt-Svc response header parser (`src/hackney_altsvc.erl`). When an HTTP server returns an `Alt-Svc` header whose value begins with a non-token byte (e.g. `!`, `@`, `=`, `;`), the parser enters a tight tail-recursive loop that pins an Erlang scheduler at 100% CPU and permanently hangs the calling connection process. Because the parser is invoked synchronously on every HTTP response, any attacker-controlled origin can trigger the hang with a single-byte header value.\n\n### Details\n\n**1. Parser dispatch**\n\n`parse_and_cache/3` is called inside the hackney connection process on each HTTP response. It collects all `Alt-Svc` header values via `collect_altsvc_headers/1`, concatenates them, and passes the result to `parse/1`, which calls `parse_entries(Header, [])`.\n\n**2. Failed token consumption**\n\n`parse_entries/2` \u2192 `parse_entry/1` \u2192 `parse_protocol/1` \u2192 `parse_token(Data, \u003c\u003c\u003e\u003e)`. The function `parse_token/2` pattern-matches leading bytes: alphanumeric, `-`, `_`, whitespace, and comma all have explicit clauses. Any other byte (e.g. `!`) falls through to the catch-all:\n\n```erlang\nparse_token(Rest, \u003c\u003c\u003e\u003e) -\u003e {undefined, Rest}.\n```\n\nThis returns the *input unchanged* \u2014 no byte is consumed.\n\n**3. No-progress loop**\n\n`parse_entry` propagates `{undefined, Rest}` back to `parse_entries/2`, which calls `skip_comma(Rest)`. Because the first byte is not `,`, `skip_comma` also returns `Rest` unchanged. `parse_entries` then recurses with the identical buffer:\n\n```erlang\nparse_entries(Data, Acc)  % Data identical to previous iteration\n```\n\nErlang tail recursion never preempts on a pure CPU loop, so the scheduler is pinned and the process never yields or returns.\n\n**4. Root cause**\n\n`parse_entries/2` has no guard that detects zero-byte progress after a failed `parse_entry` call and no fallback to advance past the offending byte.\n\n### PoC\n\n1. Start an HTTP server that responds with the header `Alt-Svc: !` (any single non-token byte suffices).\n2. Issue any HTTP GET request via hackney to that server:\n   ```erlang\n   hackney:request(get, \"http://attacker.example/\", [], \u003c\u003c\u003e\u003e, [])\n   ```\n3. Observe that the call never returns; the Erlang scheduler hosting the connection process is pinned at 100% CPU indefinitely.\n\nAlternatively, call the parser directly: `hackney_altsvc:parse(\u003c\u003c\"!\"\u003e\u003e)` \u2014 the process hangs immediately.\n\n### Impact\n\nDenial of service via unbounded CPU consumption. Any application using hackney 2.0.0-beta.1 through 4.0.0 that connects to attacker-controlled HTTP endpoints is affected. No authentication is required; a single response header byte is sufficient to hang the connection process. Fixed in hackney 4.0.1. CVSS v4.0 score: **8.7 (HIGH)**.\n\n## Resources\n\n* Introduction commit: https://github.com/benoitc/hackney/commit/408e5fe20302226ea8c74dde2bcbd452d712b5b2\n* Patch commit: https://github.com/benoitc/hackney/commit/e548aba1f97ffa3f4750da7b772998fb78c01894",
  "id": "GHSA-6cp8-v795-jr2j",
  "modified": "2026-06-26T21:53:07Z",
  "published": "2026-06-26T21:53:07Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/benoitc/hackney/security/advisories/GHSA-6cp8-v795-jr2j"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-47066"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/benoitc/hackney/commit/e548aba1f97ffa3f4750da7b772998fb78c01894"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-47066.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/benoitc/hackney"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-47066"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Hackney has an infinite loop on non-token byte at start of an Alt-Svc entry"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…