ghsa-67jj-2hgw-486p
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 18:38
Modified
2022-05-01 18:38
Details

Memory leak in a certain Red Hat patch, applied to vsftpd 2.0.5 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 5 and Fedora 6 through 8, and on Foresight Linux and rPath appliances, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a large number of CWD commands, as demonstrated by an attack on a daemon with the deny_file configuration option.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2007-5962"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2008-05-22T13:09:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Memory leak in a certain Red Hat patch, applied to vsftpd 2.0.5 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 5 and Fedora 6 through 8, and on Foresight Linux and rPath appliances, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a large number of CWD commands, as demonstrated by an attack on a daemon with the deny_file configuration option.",
  "id": "GHSA-67jj-2hgw-486p",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T18:38:16Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T18:38:16Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-5962"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008:0295"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2007-5962"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=397011"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/42593"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A8850"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/5814"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-May/msg00681.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-May/msg00691.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-May/msg00699.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/30341"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/30354"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1020079"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://wiki.rpath.com/wiki/Advisories:rPSA-2008-0185"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/05/21/10"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/05/21/12"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/05/21/8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2008-0295.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/493167/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/29322"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/1600"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.