ghsa-6757-xxcc-3797
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-05-14 18:30
Modified
2024-05-14 18:30
Severity ?
Details
The Joli FAQ SEO – WordPress FAQ Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation when saving settings. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-4082" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2024-05-14T15:42:51Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The Joli FAQ SEO \u2013 WordPress FAQ Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation when saving settings. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the plugin\u0027s settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.", "id": "GHSA-6757-xxcc-3797", "modified": "2024-05-14T18:30:54Z", "published": "2024-05-14T18:30:54Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-4082" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=\u0026reponame=\u0026new=3081648%40joli-faq-seo%2Ftrunk\u0026old=3076380%40joli-faq-seo%2Ftrunk\u0026sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/c45b6163-7ebf-4f18-afd6-735d02d9170d?source=cve" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.