GHSA-63MQ-WFR3-4M2H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 04:47 – Updated: 2022-05-17 04:47
VLAI
Details
The SAP Software Deployment Manager (SDM), in certain unspecified conditions, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via vectors related to failed authentications.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2013-7366"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-287"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-04-10T20:55:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The SAP Software Deployment Manager (SDM), in certain unspecified conditions, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via vectors related to failed authentications.",
"id": "GHSA-63mq-wfr3-4m2h",
"modified": "2022-05-17T04:47:27Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T04:47:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-7366"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1586419"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2013-02/0131.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-8218"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.onapsis.com/get.php?resid=adv_onapsis-2013-002"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.onapsis.com/research-advisories.php"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
Loading…
Loading…