ghsa-636r-h4xv-42wh
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-03-20 15:32
Modified
2024-03-20 15:32
Severity ?
Details
The Contests by Rewards Fuel plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'update_rewards_fuel_api_key' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.64 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-1787" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2024-03-20T02:15:08Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The Contests by Rewards Fuel plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the \u0027update_rewards_fuel_api_key\u0027 parameter in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.64 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.", "id": "GHSA-636r-h4xv-42wh", "modified": "2024-03-20T15:32:26Z", "published": "2024-03-20T15:32:26Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-1787" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=\u0026reponame=\u0026old=3051990%40contests-from-rewards-fuel\u0026new=3051990%40contests-from-rewards-fuel\u0026sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/9eeec949-e440-4df3-8c26-db92498cada3?source=cve" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.