GHSA-634J-P4V9-J6FM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 01:49 – Updated: 2022-05-01 01:49
VLAI
Details
Adobe Acrobat Reader 6.0.3 and 7.0.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a PDF file that contains a negative Count value in the root page node.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2005-0492"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2005-05-02T04:00:00Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "Adobe Acrobat Reader 6.0.3 and 7.0.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a PDF file that contains a negative Count value in the root page node.",
"id": "GHSA-634j-p4v9-j6fm",
"modified": "2022-05-01T01:49:47Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T01:49:47Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-0492"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/19946"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=110879063511486\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/14813"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.adobe.com/support/techdocs/331468.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2005/0310"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…