GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-5R99-PJ6C-HG6V

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-25 12:30 – Updated: 2026-04-18 09:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix accepting multiple L2CAP_ECRED_CONN_REQ

Currently the code attempts to accept requests regardless of the command identifier which may cause multiple requests to be marked as pending (FLAG_DEFER_SETUP) which can cause more than L2CAP_ECRED_MAX_CID(5) to be allocated in l2cap_ecred_rsp_defer causing an overflow.

The spec is quite clear that the same identifier shall not be used on subsequent requests:

'Within each signaling channel a different Identifier shall be used for each successive request or indication.' https://www.bluetooth.com/wp-content/uploads/Files/Specification/HTML/Core-62/out/en/host/logical-link-control-and-adaptation-protocol-specification.html#UUID-32a25a06-4aa4-c6c7-77c5-dcfe3682355d

So this attempts to check if there are any channels pending with the same identifier and rejects if any are found.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-23395"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-03-25T11:16:40Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nBluetooth: L2CAP: Fix accepting multiple L2CAP_ECRED_CONN_REQ\n\nCurrently the code attempts to accept requests regardless of the\ncommand identifier which may cause multiple requests to be marked\nas pending (FLAG_DEFER_SETUP) which can cause more than\nL2CAP_ECRED_MAX_CID(5) to be allocated in l2cap_ecred_rsp_defer\ncausing an overflow.\n\nThe spec is quite clear that the same identifier shall not be used on\nsubsequent requests:\n\n\u0027Within each signaling channel a different Identifier shall be used\nfor each successive request or indication.\u0027\nhttps://www.bluetooth.com/wp-content/uploads/Files/Specification/HTML/Core-62/out/en/host/logical-link-control-and-adaptation-protocol-specification.html#UUID-32a25a06-4aa4-c6c7-77c5-dcfe3682355d\n\nSo this attempts to check if there are any channels pending with the\nsame identifier and rejects if any are found.",
  "id": "GHSA-5r99-pj6c-hg6v",
  "modified": "2026-04-18T09:30:18Z",
  "published": "2026-03-25T12:30:24Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23395"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/10a7a702542240d5edb2b39450ac951c59ccd009"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2124d82fd25e1671bb3ceb37998af5aae5903e06"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/46e5b71666fb7652082e4e214a3365f4b14f1dc3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5b3e2052334f2ff6d5200e952f4aa66994d09899"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6b949a6b33cbdf621d9fc6f0c48ac00915dbf514"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8d0d94f8ba5b3a0beec3b0da558b9bea48018117"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e72ee455297b794b852e5cea8d2d7bb17312172a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fb4a3a26483f3ea2cd21c7a2f7c45d5670600465"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…