ghsa-5r7w-xvrp-rg22
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 16:47
Modified
2025-04-01 21:30
Severity ?
9.8 (Critical) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Details

A flaw was found in Exim versions 4.87 to 4.91 (inclusive). Improper validation of recipient address in deliver_message() function in /src/deliver.c may lead to remote command execution.

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2019-10149",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [
         "CWE-20",
         "CWE-78",
      ],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2019-06-05T14:29:00Z",
      severity: "CRITICAL",
   },
   details: "A flaw was found in Exim versions 4.87 to 4.91 (inclusive). Improper validation of recipient address in deliver_message() function in /src/deliver.c may lead to remote command execution.",
   id: "GHSA-5r7w-xvrp-rg22",
   modified: "2025-04-01T21:30:28Z",
   published: "2022-05-24T16:47:12Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-10149",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-10149",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Jun/5",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201906-01",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4010-1",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.debian.org/security/2019/dsa-4456",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.exim.org/static/doc/security/CVE-2019-10149.txt",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00020.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153218/Exim-4.9.1-Remote-Command-Execution.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153312/Exim-4.91-Local-Privilege-Escalation.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/154198/Exim-4.91-Local-Privilege-Escalation.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Jun/16",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/06/05/2",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/06/05/3",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/06/05/4",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/06/06/1",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/25/6",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/25/7",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/26/4",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/05/04/7",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/108679",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [
      {
         score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
         type: "CVSS_V3",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.