GHSA-5MQX-JW5R-HP6C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-22 18:30 – Updated: 2026-08-25 06:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
vhost_iotlb: bound map allocation in add_range
vhost_iotlb_add_range_ctx() only retires an old entry when the table has a non-zero limit, has exactly reached that limit and has VHOST_IOTLB_FLAG_RETIRE set. Non-retiring tables can keep allocating entries after reaching their configured limit.
Existing vhost devices allocate their IOTLB with max_iotlb_entries from vhost.c, which defaults to 2048 and is tunable by module parameter. Use the caller-provided limit at the allocation point instead of adding a separate default in the common IOTLB helper, and reject non-positive values in vhost paths that can report an error.
Other vhost IOTLB users should not create zero-limit tables when entries can be populated from userspace or guest-controlled requests. Add caller-side max_iotlb_entries parameters for mlx5 vDPA, VDUSE and vhost-vDPA. Reject non-positive VDUSE and vhost-vDPA values, and require at least two entries for vdpa_sim and mlx5 vDPA paths that install full-range mappings, since those mappings are split into two IOTLB entries.
Handle full-range mappings in the common helper by checking that the IOTLB can hold both split entries before inserting the first half. This avoids returning an error after leaving a half mapping behind.
When the table is full, keep the existing retire behavior for retiring tables and return -ENOSPC for non-retiring tables. Reuse the retired map node instead of freeing it and allocating a replacement, so a stream of IOTLB updates cannot keep forcing GFP_ATOMIC allocations after the table has reached its limit. If a zero-limit IOTLB still reaches the common helper, treat it as a configuration error and return -EINVAL.
I found this bug myself, though the patch was written with AI assistance.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-74713"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-08-22T16:16:46Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nvhost_iotlb: bound map allocation in add_range\n\nvhost_iotlb_add_range_ctx() only retires an old entry when the table\nhas a non-zero limit, has exactly reached that limit and has\nVHOST_IOTLB_FLAG_RETIRE set. Non-retiring tables can keep allocating\nentries after reaching their configured limit.\n\nExisting vhost devices allocate their IOTLB with max_iotlb_entries from\nvhost.c, which defaults to 2048 and is tunable by module parameter. Use\nthe caller-provided limit at the allocation point instead of adding a\nseparate default in the common IOTLB helper, and reject non-positive\nvalues in vhost paths that can report an error.\n\nOther vhost IOTLB users should not create zero-limit tables when entries\ncan be populated from userspace or guest-controlled requests. Add\ncaller-side max_iotlb_entries parameters for mlx5 vDPA, VDUSE and\nvhost-vDPA. Reject non-positive VDUSE and vhost-vDPA values, and require\nat least two entries for vdpa_sim and mlx5 vDPA paths that install\nfull-range mappings, since those mappings are split into two IOTLB\nentries.\n\nHandle full-range mappings in the common helper by checking that the\nIOTLB can hold both split entries before inserting the first half. This\navoids returning an error after leaving a half mapping behind.\n\nWhen the table is full, keep the existing retire behavior for retiring\ntables and return -ENOSPC for non-retiring tables. Reuse the retired map\nnode instead of freeing it and allocating a replacement, so a stream of\nIOTLB updates cannot keep forcing GFP_ATOMIC allocations after the table\nhas reached its limit. If a zero-limit IOTLB still reaches the common\nhelper, treat it as a configuration error and return -EINVAL.\n\nI found this bug myself, though the patch was written with AI assistance.",
"id": "GHSA-5mqx-jw5r-hp6c",
"modified": "2026-08-25T06:31:29Z",
"published": "2026-08-22T18:30:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-74713"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1ed35ac7f3fe2b4396bdd29ac3a7f0ebc0829e94"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ae128dd19040ee06a4f8143c7ced4d18080d7a9a"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.