GHSA-5JJ2-MFFV-RJH4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:41 – Updated: 2025-04-11 04:01
VLAI
Details
Tigase XMPP Server before 5.1.0 does not verify that a request was made for an XMPP Server Dialback response, which allows remote XMPP servers to spoof domains via a (1) Verify Response or (2) Authorization Response.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2012-4670"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2012-08-25T16:55:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Tigase XMPP Server before 5.1.0 does not verify that a request was made for an XMPP Server Dialback response, which allows remote XMPP servers to spoof domains via a (1) Verify Response or (2) Authorization Response.",
"id": "GHSA-5jj2-mffv-rjh4",
"modified": "2025-04-11T04:01:10Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T01:41:32Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-4670"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/77985"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://projects.tigase.org/projects/tigase-server/repository/revisions/2953/diff"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.tigase.org/content/finally-version-510-final-available"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://xmpp.org/resources/security-notices/server-dialback"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…