ghsa-5f9c-xx25-xwrv
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-05 02:48
Modified
2022-05-05 02:48
Details
(a) mount and (b) umount in util-linux 2.14.1, 2.17.2, and probably other versions allow local users to determine the existence of restricted directories by (1) using the --guess-fstype command-line option or (2) attempting to mount a non-existent device, which generates different error messages depending on whether the directory exists.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2013-0157", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-200", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2014-01-21T18:55:00Z", severity: "LOW", }, details: "(a) mount and (b) umount in util-linux 2.14.1, 2.17.2, and probably other versions allow local users to determine the existence of restricted directories by (1) using the --guess-fstype command-line option or (2) attempting to mount a non-existent device, which generates different error messages depending on whether the directory exists.", id: "GHSA-5f9c-xx25-xwrv", modified: "2022-05-05T02:48:30Z", published: "2022-05-05T02:48:30Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-0157", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892330", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://bugs.debian.org/697464", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=135749410312247&w=2", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://osvdb.org/88953", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0517.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2013:154", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.