GHSA-5F5V-5C3V-GW5V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-05-23 14:45 – Updated: 2024-05-23 14:45
VLAI
Summary
Silverstripe IE requests not properly behaving with rewritehashlinks
Details
Non IE browsers don’t appear to be affected, but I haven’t tested a wide range of browsers to be sure
Requests that come through from IE do NOT appear to encode all entities in the URL string, meaning they are inserted into output content directly by SSViewer::process() when rewriting hashlinks, as it directly outputs $_SERVER[‘REQUEST_URI’]
Example IE8 request 127.0.0.1 - - [18/Jun/2014:14:13:42 +1000] “GET /site/cars/brands/toyota?one=1\”onmouseover=\”alert(‘things’);\” HTTP/1.1” 200
Example FF request 127.0.0.1 - - [18/Jun/2014:14:14:22 +1000] “GET /site/cars/brands/toyota?one=1\%22onmouseover=\%22alert(%27things%27);\%22 HTTP/1.1” 200
This causes any hash anchor to have the JS code inserted into the page as-is.
Severity
6.1 (Medium)
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 3.0.12"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "silverstripe/framework"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.0.13"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 3.1.11"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "silverstripe/framework"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "3.1.0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.1.12"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-79"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-05-23T14:45:11Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Non IE browsers don\u2019t appear to be affected, but I haven\u2019t tested a wide range of browsers to be sure \n\nRequests that come through from IE do NOT appear to encode all entities in the URL string, meaning they are inserted into output content directly by SSViewer::process() when rewriting hashlinks, as it directly outputs $_SERVER[\u2018REQUEST_URI\u2019]\n\n**Example IE8 request**\n127.0.0.1 - - [18/Jun/2014:14:13:42 +1000] \u201cGET /site/cars/brands/toyota?one=1\\\u201donmouseover=\\\u201dalert(\u2018things\u2019);\\\u201d HTTP/1.1\u201d 200\n\n**Example FF request**\n127.0.0.1 - - [18/Jun/2014:14:14:22 +1000] \u201cGET /site/cars/brands/toyota?one=1\\%22onmouseover=\\%22alert(%27things%27);\\%22 HTTP/1.1\u201d 200\n\nThis causes any hash anchor to have the JS code inserted into the page as-is.",
"id": "GHSA-5f5v-5c3v-gw5v",
"modified": "2024-05-23T14:45:11Z",
"published": "2024-05-23T14:45:11Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/silverstripe/silverstripe-framework/commit/604c32871202064a4aa12c3b3fd58140231685e5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/silverstripe/silverstripe-framework/commit/bdef4fc7a548c7c243ff86f2db7c16f301a6f120"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/FriendsOfPHP/security-advisories/blob/master/silverstripe/framework/SS-2014-015-1.yaml"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/silverstripe/silverstripe-framework"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.silverstripe.org/software/download/security-releases/ss-2014-015-ie-requests-not-properly-behaving-with-rewritehashlinks"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Silverstripe IE requests not properly behaving with rewritehashlinks"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
Loading…
Loading…