GHSA-5CMQ-34WW-75F4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 03:34 – Updated: 2025-04-12 12:42
VLAI
Details
The raw_decode function in libavcodec/rawdec.c in FFMpeg before 2.1.6, 2.2.x through 2.3.x, and 2.4.x before 2.4.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds heap access) and possibly have other unspecified impact via a crafted .cine file that triggers the avpicture_get_size function to return a negative frame size.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-9318"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-12-09T23:59:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The raw_decode function in libavcodec/rawdec.c in FFMpeg before 2.1.6, 2.2.x through 2.3.x, and 2.4.x before 2.4.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds heap access) and possibly have other unspecified impact via a crafted .cine file that triggers the avpicture_get_size function to return a negative frame size.",
"id": "GHSA-5cmq-34ww-75f4",
"modified": "2025-04-12T12:42:43Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T03:34:37Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-9318"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201603-06"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.ffmpeg.org/security.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://git.videolan.org/?p=ffmpeg.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=1d3a3b9f8907625b361420d48fe05716859620ff"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://git.videolan.org/?p=ffmpeg.git;a=commit;h=1d3a3b9f8907625b361420d48fe05716859620ff"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…