ghsa-57ch-4f4p-v65v
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-29 01:25
Modified
2022-04-29 01:25
Details

Unknown vulnerability in tcpdump before 3.7.2 related to an inability to "Handle unknown RADIUS attributes properly," allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop), a different vulnerability than CAN-2003-0093.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2003-0145"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2003-03-31T05:00:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Unknown vulnerability in tcpdump before 3.7.2 related to an inability to \"Handle unknown RADIUS attributes properly,\" allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop), a different vulnerability than CAN-2003-0093.",
  "id": "GHSA-57ch-4f4p-v65v",
  "modified": "2022-04-29T01:25:55Z",
  "published": "2022-04-29T01:25:55Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2003-0145"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/11857"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2003/dsa-261"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.mandrakesoft.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2003:027"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2003-032.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2003-151.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2003-214.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.tcpdump.org/tcpdump-changes.txt"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.