ghsa-563c-77qf-c6mg
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:12
Modified
2022-05-13 01:12
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CUCM) 7.1(x) through 9.1(2) and the IM & Presence Service in Cisco Unified Presence Server through 9.1(2) use the same CTI and database-encryption key across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by leveraging knowledge of this key, aka Bug IDs CSCsc69187 and CSCui01756. NOTE: the vendor has provided a statement that the "hard-coded static encryption key is considered a hardening issue rather than a vulnerability, and as such, has a CVSS score of 0/0."
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2013-4869" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-522" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2013-07-18T12:48:00Z", "severity": "LOW" }, "details": "Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CUCM) 7.1(x) through 9.1(2) and the IM \u0026 Presence Service in Cisco Unified Presence Server through 9.1(2) use the same CTI and database-encryption key across different customers\u0027 installations, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by leveraging knowledge of this key, aka Bug IDs CSCsc69187 and CSCui01756. NOTE: the vendor has provided a statement that the \"hard-coded static encryption key is considered a hardening issue rather than a vulnerability, and as such, has a CVSS score of 0/0.\"", "id": "GHSA-563c-77qf-c6mg", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:12:20Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:12:20Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-4869" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/85883" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20130717-cucm" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…