GHSA-527X-5WRF-22M2

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-08 20:12 – Updated: 2026-01-08 20:12
VLAI
Summary
CoreDNS gRPC/HTTPS/HTTP3 servers lack resource limits, enabling DoS via unbounded connections and oversized messages
Details

Multiple CoreDNS server implementations (gRPC, HTTPS, and HTTP/3) lack critical resource-limiting controls. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exhaust memory and degrade or crash the server by opening many concurrent connections, streams, or sending oversized request bodies. The issue is similar in nature to CVE-2025-47950 (QUIC DoS) but affects additional server types that do not enforce connection limits, stream limits, or message size constraints.

Impact

1. Missing connection and stream limits (gRPC / HTTPS / HTTP3)

The affected servers do not enforce reasonable upper bounds on concurrent connections or active streams. An attacker can:

  • Open many parallel connections
  • Rapidly issue requests without limit
  • Consume memory until the CoreDNS process becomes unresponsive or is terminated by the OOM killer

Testing demonstrates that modest resource configurations (e.g., 256 MB RAM) can be exhausted quickly. Increasing concurrency parameters in the PoCs allows attackers to scale the impact.

2. Missing message-size validation in the gRPC server

The gRPC server accepts arbitrarily large protobuf messages (default limit ~4 MB per request) without validating against DNS protocol constraints (maximum 64 KB). Sending multiple concurrent oversized messages can quickly exhaust available memory.

This vulnerability mirrors earlier hardening work in PR https://github.com/coredns/coredns/pull/7490, which applied checks for upstream proxying but left server-side request validation unprotected.

Result:

In all cases, remote unauthenticated attackers can reliably trigger memory exhaustion and cause a denial of service.

Patches

v1.14.0

Severity
6.6 (Medium)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/coredns/coredns"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.14.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-68151"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-770"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-01-08T20:12:58Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-01-08T16:15:59Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Multiple CoreDNS server implementations (gRPC, HTTPS, and HTTP/3) lack critical resource-limiting controls. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exhaust memory and degrade or crash the server by opening many concurrent connections, streams, or sending oversized request bodies. The issue is similar in nature to CVE-2025-47950 (QUIC DoS) but affects additional server types that do not enforce connection limits, stream limits, or message size constraints.\n\n### Impact\n\n#### 1. Missing connection and stream limits (gRPC / HTTPS / HTTP3)\n\nThe affected servers do not enforce reasonable upper bounds on concurrent connections or active streams. An attacker can:\n\n- Open many parallel connections\n- Rapidly issue requests without limit\n- Consume memory until the CoreDNS process becomes unresponsive or is terminated by the OOM killer\n\nTesting demonstrates that modest resource configurations (e.g., 256 MB RAM) can be exhausted quickly. Increasing concurrency parameters in the PoCs allows attackers to scale the impact.\n\n#### 2. Missing message-size validation in the gRPC server\n\nThe gRPC server accepts arbitrarily large protobuf messages (default limit ~4 MB per request) without validating against DNS protocol constraints (maximum 64 KB). Sending multiple concurrent oversized messages can quickly exhaust available memory.\n\nThis vulnerability mirrors earlier hardening work in PR https://github.com/coredns/coredns/pull/7490, which applied checks for upstream proxying but left server-side request validation unprotected.\n\n#### Result:\nIn all cases, remote unauthenticated attackers can reliably trigger memory exhaustion and cause a denial of service.\n\n\n### Patches\n_v1.14.0_",
  "id": "GHSA-527x-5wrf-22m2",
  "modified": "2026-01-08T20:12:58Z",
  "published": "2026-01-08T20:12:58Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/coredns/coredns/security/advisories/GHSA-527x-5wrf-22m2"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68151"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/coredns/coredns/pull/7490"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/coredns/coredns/commit/0d8cbb1a6bcb6bc9c1a489865278b8725fa20812"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/coredns/coredns"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "CoreDNS gRPC/HTTPS/HTTP3 servers lack resource limits, enabling DoS via unbounded connections and oversized messages"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.