GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-4X9V-H3R3-C3MF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-08-16 12:30 – Updated: 2025-11-19 00:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

cifs: Fix the smbd_response slab to allow usercopy

The handling of received data in the smbdirect client code involves using copy_to_iter() to copy data from the smbd_reponse struct's packet trailer to a folioq buffer provided by netfslib that encapsulates a chunk of pagecache.

If, however, CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY=y, this will result in the checks then performed in copy_to_iter() oopsing with something like the following:

CIFS: Attempting to mount //172.31.9.1/test CIFS: VFS: RDMA transport established usercopy: Kernel memory exposure attempt detected from SLUB object 'smbd_response_0000000091e24ea1' (offset 81, size 63)! ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at mm/usercopy.c:102! ... RIP: 0010:usercopy_abort+0x6c/0x80 ... Call Trace: __check_heap_object+0xe3/0x120 __check_object_size+0x4dc/0x6d0 smbd_recv+0x77f/0xfe0 [cifs] cifs_readv_from_socket+0x276/0x8f0 [cifs] cifs_read_from_socket+0xcd/0x120 [cifs] cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x7e9/0x2d50 [cifs] kthread+0x396/0x830 ret_from_fork+0x2b8/0x3b0 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

The problem is that the smbd_response slab's packet field isn't marked as being permitted for usercopy.

Fix this by passing parameters to kmem_slab_create() to indicate that copy_to_iter() is permitted from the packet region of the smbd_response slab objects, less the header space.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-38523"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-1188"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-08-16T12:15:27Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ncifs: Fix the smbd_response slab to allow usercopy\n\nThe handling of received data in the smbdirect client code involves using\ncopy_to_iter() to copy data from the smbd_reponse struct\u0027s packet trailer\nto a folioq buffer provided by netfslib that encapsulates a chunk of\npagecache.\n\nIf, however, CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY=y, this will result in the checks\nthen performed in copy_to_iter() oopsing with something like the following:\n\n CIFS: Attempting to mount //172.31.9.1/test\n CIFS: VFS: RDMA transport established\n usercopy: Kernel memory exposure attempt detected from SLUB object \u0027smbd_response_0000000091e24ea1\u0027 (offset 81, size 63)!\n ------------[ cut here ]------------\n kernel BUG at mm/usercopy.c:102!\n ...\n RIP: 0010:usercopy_abort+0x6c/0x80\n ...\n Call Trace:\n  \u003cTASK\u003e\n  __check_heap_object+0xe3/0x120\n  __check_object_size+0x4dc/0x6d0\n  smbd_recv+0x77f/0xfe0 [cifs]\n  cifs_readv_from_socket+0x276/0x8f0 [cifs]\n  cifs_read_from_socket+0xcd/0x120 [cifs]\n  cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x7e9/0x2d50 [cifs]\n  kthread+0x396/0x830\n  ret_from_fork+0x2b8/0x3b0\n  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\n\nThe problem is that the smbd_response slab\u0027s packet field isn\u0027t marked as\nbeing permitted for usercopy.\n\nFix this by passing parameters to kmem_slab_create() to indicate that\ncopy_to_iter() is permitted from the packet region of the smbd_response\nslab objects, less the header space.",
  "id": "GHSA-4x9v-h3r3-c3mf",
  "modified": "2025-11-19T00:31:23Z",
  "published": "2025-08-16T12:30:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38523"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/43e7e284fc77b710d899569360ea46fa3374ae22"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/87dcc7e33fc3dcb8ed32333cec016528b5bb6ce4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f0dd353d47f7051afa98c6c60c7486831eb1a410"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…