GHSA-4MM9-H7GJ-362G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-24 18:31 – Updated: 2026-07-27 06:30In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
pwrseq: core: fix use-after-free in pwrseq_debugfs_seq_next()
pwrseq_debugfs_seq_next() declares 'next' with __free(put_device), which causes put_device() to be called on the returned pointer when the variable goes out of scope. This results in a use-after-free since the seq_file framework receives a pointer whose reference has already been dropped.
Simply removing __free(put_device) would fix the UAF but would leak the reference acquired by bus_find_next_device(), as stop() only calls up_read(&pwrseq_sem) and never releases the device reference.
Fix this by making the reference counting consistent across all seq_file callbacks, matching the standard pattern used by PCI and SCSI:
- start(): use get_device() so it returns a referenced pointer.
- next(): explicitly put_device(curr) to release the previous device's reference (no NULL check needed - the seq_file framework only calls next() while the previous return was non-NULL).
- stop(): put_device(data) to release the last iterated device's reference, with a NULL guard since stop() may be called with NULL when start() returned NULL or next() reached end-of-sequence.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-64251"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-07-24T16:16:54Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\npwrseq: core: fix use-after-free in pwrseq_debugfs_seq_next()\n\npwrseq_debugfs_seq_next() declares \u0027next\u0027 with __free(put_device),\nwhich causes put_device() to be called on the returned pointer when\nthe variable goes out of scope. This results in a use-after-free\nsince the seq_file framework receives a pointer whose reference has\nalready been dropped.\n\nSimply removing __free(put_device) would fix the UAF but would leak\nthe reference acquired by bus_find_next_device(), as stop() only\ncalls up_read(\u0026pwrseq_sem) and never releases the device reference.\n\nFix this by making the reference counting consistent across all\nseq_file callbacks, matching the standard pattern used by PCI and\nSCSI:\n\n- start(): use get_device() so it returns a referenced pointer.\n- next(): explicitly put_device(curr) to release the previous\n device\u0027s reference (no NULL check needed - the seq_file framework\n only calls next() while the previous return was non-NULL).\n- stop(): put_device(data) to release the last iterated device\u0027s\n reference, with a NULL guard since stop() may be called with NULL\n when start() returned NULL or next() reached end-of-sequence.",
"id": "GHSA-4mm9-h7gj-362g",
"modified": "2026-07-27T06:30:30Z",
"published": "2026-07-24T18:31:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64251"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/257595adf9dac15ae1edd9d07753fbc576a7583d"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/73569a44fca2992f0ca4a4c0104069741b9873a0"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ba0b9f04c7a5f9887b8ce672eaf049502c0548ec"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e91df6d273445c03f5aa302bfe147eda33d45794"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.