ghsa-48m3-5gf3-cq84
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 04:44
Modified
2022-05-17 04:44
Details
Xen 4.0, and 4.1, when running a 64-bit PV guest on "older" AMD CPUs, does not properly protect against a certain AMD processor bug, which allows local guest OS users to cause a denial of service (host hang) via sequential execution of instructions across a non-canonical boundary, a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-0217.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2012-2934" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2012-12-03T21:55:00Z", "severity": "LOW" }, "details": "Xen 4.0, and 4.1, when running a 64-bit PV guest on \"older\" AMD CPUs, does not properly protect against a certain AMD processor bug, which allows local guest OS users to cause a denial of service (host hang) via sequential execution of instructions across a non-canonical boundary, a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-0217.", "id": "GHSA-48m3-5gf3-cq84", "modified": "2022-05-17T04:44:57Z", "published": "2022-05-17T04:44:57Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-2934" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-11/msg00017.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-11/msg00018.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-announce/2012-06/msg00002.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/51413" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/55082" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201309-24.xml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://support.amd.com/us/Processor_TechDocs/25759.pdf" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2501" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/53961" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.