ghsa-43qp-rp4g-mx9r
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 01:00
Modified
2022-05-17 01:00
Details
The csnStreamDissector function in epan/dissectors/packet-csn1.c in the CSN.1 dissector in Wireshark 1.6.x before 1.6.3 does not initialize a certain variable, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a malformed packet.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2011-4100" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2011-11-03T15:55:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The csnStreamDissector function in epan/dissectors/packet-csn1.c in the CSN.1 dissector in Wireshark 1.6.x before 1.6.3 does not initialize a certain variable, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a malformed packet.", "id": "GHSA-43qp-rp4g-mx9r", "modified": "2022-05-17T01:00:10Z", "published": "2022-05-17T01:00:10Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-4100" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6351" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750643" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/71090" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A14833" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc?view=revision\u0026revision=39140" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/11/01/9" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://osvdb.org/76768" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/46644" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/50479" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.wireshark.org/security/wnpa-sec-2011-17.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.