GHSA-3M3F-RVF7-9VP6

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-24 12:30 – Updated: 2025-12-24 12:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

exfat: fix divide-by-zero in exfat_allocate_bitmap

The variable max_ra_count can be 0 in exfat_allocate_bitmap(), which causes a divide-by-zero error in the subsequent modulo operation (i % max_ra_count), leading to a system crash. When max_ra_count is 0, it means that readahead is not used. This patch load the bitmap without readahead.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-68350"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-12-24T11:15:58Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nexfat: fix divide-by-zero in exfat_allocate_bitmap\n\nThe variable max_ra_count can be 0 in exfat_allocate_bitmap(),\nwhich causes a divide-by-zero error in the subsequent modulo operation\n(i % max_ra_count), leading to a system crash.\nWhen max_ra_count is 0, it means that readahead is not used. This patch\nload the bitmap without readahead.",
  "id": "GHSA-3m3f-rvf7-9vp6",
  "modified": "2025-12-24T12:30:29Z",
  "published": "2025-12-24T12:30:29Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68350"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/88fc3dd6e631b3e2975f898c6c2b6bc6f7058b44"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d70a5804c563b5e34825353ba9927509df709651"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…