GHSA-3JG7-R7PG-8654

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-11 21:31 – Updated: 2026-09-14 15:32
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ocfs2: fix readdir position truncation on 32-bit kernels

In ocfs2_dir_foreach_blk_el(), the directory cookie position is rebuilt with

ctx->pos = (ctx->pos & ~(sb->s_blocksize - 1)) | offset;

ctx->pos is loff_t (signed 64-bit), while sb->s_blocksize is unsigned long. On 32-bit kernels unsigned long is 32-bit, so the mask

~(sb->s_blocksize - 1)

is computed as a 32-bit unsigned value (e.g. 0xfffff000 for a 4 KiB block size). In the AND expression with the 64-bit ctx->pos, that unsigned operand is zero-extended to 64 bits per the usual arithmetic conversions, yielding 0x00000000fffff000. The high 32 bits of ctx->pos are silently cleared, even though directory size is allowed to exceed 4 GiB.

When readdir() crosses the 4 GiB boundary on a 32-bit kernel the position is reset back into the first 4 GiB block, making the re-validation path re-enumerate already-returned dirents indefinitely.

This is ocfs2_dir_foreach_blk_el(), the extent-list readdir path taken for all non-inline directories, so a directory large enough to cross 4 GiB reaches it.

This is the same class of bug that commit 3dce5bb82c97 ("exfat: Fix bitwise operation having different size") fixed in exfat, and the fix mirrors the equivalent ext4 fix in this series. Cast the operand to loff_t so the mask is 64-bit before the AND:

ctx->pos = (ctx->pos & ~((loff_t)sb->s_blocksize - 1)) | offset;

64-bit kernels are unaffected.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-89490"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-11T20:19:30Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nocfs2: fix readdir position truncation on 32-bit kernels\n\nIn ocfs2_dir_foreach_blk_el(), the directory cookie position is\nrebuilt with\n\n\tctx-\u003epos = (ctx-\u003epos \u0026 ~(sb-\u003es_blocksize - 1)) | offset;\n\n`ctx-\u003epos` is loff_t (signed 64-bit), while `sb-\u003es_blocksize` is\nunsigned long.  On 32-bit kernels unsigned long is 32-bit, so the mask\n\n\t~(sb-\u003es_blocksize - 1)\n\nis computed as a 32-bit unsigned value (e.g. 0xfffff000 for a 4 KiB\nblock size).  In the AND expression with the 64-bit `ctx-\u003epos`, that\nunsigned operand is zero-extended to 64 bits per the usual arithmetic\nconversions, yielding 0x00000000fffff000.  The high 32 bits of\n`ctx-\u003epos` are silently cleared, even though directory size is\nallowed to exceed 4 GiB.\n\nWhen readdir() crosses the 4 GiB boundary on a 32-bit kernel the\nposition is reset back into the first 4 GiB block, making the\nre-validation path re-enumerate already-returned dirents indefinitely.\n\nThis is ocfs2_dir_foreach_blk_el(), the extent-list readdir path taken\nfor all non-inline directories, so a directory large enough to cross\n4 GiB reaches it.\n\nThis is the same class of bug that commit 3dce5bb82c97 (\"exfat: Fix\nbitwise operation having different size\") fixed in exfat, and the\nfix mirrors the equivalent ext4 fix in this series.  Cast the operand\nto loff_t so the mask is 64-bit before the AND:\n\n\tctx-\u003epos = (ctx-\u003epos \u0026 ~((loff_t)sb-\u003es_blocksize - 1)) | offset;\n\n64-bit kernels are unaffected.",
  "id": "GHSA-3jg7-r7pg-8654",
  "modified": "2026-09-14T15:32:26Z",
  "published": "2026-09-11T21:31:28Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-89490"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1001fb3b69a11eaa0dc7c7428f6edfa48b88997a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1ae7029823ae4c91664cb32eec7fb8dd5e1a337a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/94569154ba49f5f85645d2019c8e206213d8404e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a63308ab426f3a3c7e33b02c150ea59054620261"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b53e2b271eeb6040c2a4a78230c570dc41cdcfa4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c0c165487a2ea5a37ddcdab4259157b7a527129c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c28dc3407937aa8f225942538cd585c9b28ea65a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f9dd5cad8d09110ddff2db1fe756aae93c7552ff"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…