ghsa-3h3j-q234-gp6p
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-02-25 00:00
Modified
2022-03-19 00:01
Severity ?
Details
An integer overflow was found in the QEMU implementation of VMWare's paravirtual RDMA device in versions prior to 6.1.0. The issue occurs while handling a "PVRDMA_REG_DSRHIGH" write from the guest due to improper input validation. This flaw allows a privileged guest user to make QEMU allocate a large amount of memory, resulting in a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2021-3607" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-190" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2022-02-24T19:15:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "An integer overflow was found in the QEMU implementation of VMWare\u0027s paravirtual RDMA device in versions prior to 6.1.0. The issue occurs while handling a \"PVRDMA_REG_DSRHIGH\" write from the guest due to improper input validation. This flaw allows a privileged guest user to make QEMU allocate a large amount of memory, resulting in a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability.", "id": "GHSA-3h3j-q234-gp6p", "modified": "2022-03-19T00:01:43Z", "published": "2022-02-25T00:00:59Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-3607" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973349" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/09/msg00008.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-06/msg07925.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202208-27" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220318-0002" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.