ghsa-37fc-3j87-m624
Vulnerability from github
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
jffs2: check that raw node were preallocated before writing summary
Syzkaller detected a kernel bug in jffs2_link_node_ref, caused by fault injection in jffs2_prealloc_raw_node_refs. jffs2_sum_write_sumnode doesn't check return value of jffs2_prealloc_raw_node_refs and simply lets any error propagate into jffs2_sum_write_data, which eventually calls jffs2_link_node_ref in order to link the summary to an expectedly allocated node.
kernel BUG at fs/jffs2/nodelist.c:592! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI CPU: 1 PID: 31277 Comm: syz-executor.7 Not tainted 6.1.128-syzkaller-00139-ge10f83ca10a1 #0 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:jffs2_link_node_ref+0x570/0x690 fs/jffs2/nodelist.c:592 Call Trace: jffs2_sum_write_data fs/jffs2/summary.c:841 [inline] jffs2_sum_write_sumnode+0xd1a/0x1da0 fs/jffs2/summary.c:874 jffs2_do_reserve_space+0xa18/0xd60 fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c:388 jffs2_reserve_space+0x55f/0xaa0 fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c:197 jffs2_write_inode_range+0x246/0xb50 fs/jffs2/write.c:362 jffs2_write_end+0x726/0x15d0 fs/jffs2/file.c:301 generic_perform_write+0x314/0x5d0 mm/filemap.c:3856 __generic_file_write_iter+0x2ae/0x4d0 mm/filemap.c:3973 generic_file_write_iter+0xe3/0x350 mm/filemap.c:4005 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2265 [inline] do_iter_readv_writev+0x20f/0x3c0 fs/read_write.c:735 do_iter_write+0x186/0x710 fs/read_write.c:861 vfs_iter_write+0x70/0xa0 fs/read_write.c:902 iter_file_splice_write+0x73b/0xc90 fs/splice.c:685 do_splice_from fs/splice.c:763 [inline] direct_splice_actor+0x10c/0x170 fs/splice.c:950 splice_direct_to_actor+0x337/0xa10 fs/splice.c:896 do_splice_direct+0x1a9/0x280 fs/splice.c:1002 do_sendfile+0xb13/0x12c0 fs/read_write.c:1255 __do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1323 [inline] __se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1309 [inline] __x64_sys_sendfile64+0x1cf/0x210 fs/read_write.c:1309 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:81 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8
Fix this issue by checking return value of jffs2_prealloc_raw_node_refs before calling jffs2_sum_write_data.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2025-38194" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2025-07-04T14:15:26Z", "severity": null }, "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\njffs2: check that raw node were preallocated before writing summary\n\nSyzkaller detected a kernel bug in jffs2_link_node_ref, caused by fault\ninjection in jffs2_prealloc_raw_node_refs. jffs2_sum_write_sumnode doesn\u0027t\ncheck return value of jffs2_prealloc_raw_node_refs and simply lets any\nerror propagate into jffs2_sum_write_data, which eventually calls\njffs2_link_node_ref in order to link the summary to an expectedly allocated\nnode.\n\nkernel BUG at fs/jffs2/nodelist.c:592!\ninvalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI\nCPU: 1 PID: 31277 Comm: syz-executor.7 Not tainted 6.1.128-syzkaller-00139-ge10f83ca10a1 #0\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014\nRIP: 0010:jffs2_link_node_ref+0x570/0x690 fs/jffs2/nodelist.c:592\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n jffs2_sum_write_data fs/jffs2/summary.c:841 [inline]\n jffs2_sum_write_sumnode+0xd1a/0x1da0 fs/jffs2/summary.c:874\n jffs2_do_reserve_space+0xa18/0xd60 fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c:388\n jffs2_reserve_space+0x55f/0xaa0 fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c:197\n jffs2_write_inode_range+0x246/0xb50 fs/jffs2/write.c:362\n jffs2_write_end+0x726/0x15d0 fs/jffs2/file.c:301\n generic_perform_write+0x314/0x5d0 mm/filemap.c:3856\n __generic_file_write_iter+0x2ae/0x4d0 mm/filemap.c:3973\n generic_file_write_iter+0xe3/0x350 mm/filemap.c:4005\n call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2265 [inline]\n do_iter_readv_writev+0x20f/0x3c0 fs/read_write.c:735\n do_iter_write+0x186/0x710 fs/read_write.c:861\n vfs_iter_write+0x70/0xa0 fs/read_write.c:902\n iter_file_splice_write+0x73b/0xc90 fs/splice.c:685\n do_splice_from fs/splice.c:763 [inline]\n direct_splice_actor+0x10c/0x170 fs/splice.c:950\n splice_direct_to_actor+0x337/0xa10 fs/splice.c:896\n do_splice_direct+0x1a9/0x280 fs/splice.c:1002\n do_sendfile+0xb13/0x12c0 fs/read_write.c:1255\n __do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1323 [inline]\n __se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1309 [inline]\n __x64_sys_sendfile64+0x1cf/0x210 fs/read_write.c:1309\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:81\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8\n\nFix this issue by checking return value of jffs2_prealloc_raw_node_refs\nbefore calling jffs2_sum_write_data.\n\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.", "id": "GHSA-37fc-3j87-m624", "modified": "2025-07-04T15:31:09Z", "published": "2025-07-04T15:31:09Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38194" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/337f80f3d546e131c7aa90b61d8cde051ae858c7" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/346cfb9d19ea7feb6fb57917b21c4797fb444dab" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3f46644a5131a4793fc95c32a7d0a769745b06e7" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4adee34098a6ee86a54bf3ec885eab620c126a6b" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8ce46dc5b10b0b6f67663202a4921b0e11ad7367" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c0edcdb4fc106d69a2d1a0ce4868193511c389f3" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/da12ef7e19048dc5714032c2db587a215852b200" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ec9e6f22bce433b260ea226de127ec68042849b0" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.