ghsa-3626-95rf-mfw3
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-30 18:21
Modified
2022-04-30 18:21
Details

OpenSSL 0.9.6e uses assertions when detecting buffer overflow attacks instead of less severe mechanisms, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via certain messages that cause OpenSSL to abort from a failed assertion, as demonstrated using SSLv2 CLIENT_MASTER_KEY messages, which are not properly handled in s2_srvr.c.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2002-1568"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2003-11-17T05:00:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "OpenSSL 0.9.6e uses assertions when detecting buffer overflow attacks instead of less severe mechanisms, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via certain messages that cause OpenSSL to abort from a failed assertion, as demonstrated using SSLv2 CLIENT_MASTER_KEY messages, which are not properly handled in s2_srvr.c.",
  "id": "GHSA-3626-95rf-mfw3",
  "modified": "2022-04-30T18:21:25Z",
  "published": "2022-04-30T18:21:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2002-1568"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=7659"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=106511018214983"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ebitech.sk/patrik/SA/SA-20031002.txt"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.