ghsa-3626-95rf-mfw3
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-30 18:21
Modified
2022-04-30 18:21
VLAI Severity ?
Details
OpenSSL 0.9.6e uses assertions when detecting buffer overflow attacks instead of less severe mechanisms, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via certain messages that cause OpenSSL to abort from a failed assertion, as demonstrated using SSLv2 CLIENT_MASTER_KEY messages, which are not properly handled in s2_srvr.c.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2002-1568"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2003-11-17T05:00:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "OpenSSL 0.9.6e uses assertions when detecting buffer overflow attacks instead of less severe mechanisms, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via certain messages that cause OpenSSL to abort from a failed assertion, as demonstrated using SSLv2 CLIENT_MASTER_KEY messages, which are not properly handled in s2_srvr.c.",
"id": "GHSA-3626-95rf-mfw3",
"modified": "2022-04-30T18:21:25Z",
"published": "2022-04-30T18:21:25Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2002-1568"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=7659"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=106511018214983"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.ebitech.sk/patrik/SA/SA-20031002.txt"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…