ghsa-2rfp-698j-hfvq
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:02
Modified
2022-05-13 01:02
Severity ?
Details
An issue was discovered in Tcpreplay 4.3.1. An invalid memory access occurs in do_checksum in checksum.c. It can be triggered by sending a crafted pcap file to the tcpreplay-edit binary. It allows an attacker to cause a Denial of Service (Segmentation fault) or possibly have unspecified other impact.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2019-8381" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2019-02-17T02:29:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "An issue was discovered in Tcpreplay 4.3.1. An invalid memory access occurs in do_checksum in checksum.c. It can be triggered by sending a crafted pcap file to the tcpreplay-edit binary. It allows an attacker to cause a Denial of Service (Segmentation fault) or possibly have unspecified other impact.", "id": "GHSA-2rfp-698j-hfvq", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:02:41Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:02:41Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-8381" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/appneta/tcpreplay/issues/538" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4V3SADKXUSHWTVAPU3WLXBDEQUHRA6ZO" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/EB3ASS7URTIA3IFSBL2DIWJAFKTBJCAW" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MLPY6W7Z7G6PF2JN4LXXHCACYLD4RBG6" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://research.loginsoft.com/bugs/invalid-memory-access-vulnerability-in-function-do_checksum-tcpreplay-4-3-1" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.