ghsa-2rfp-698j-hfvq
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:02
Modified
2022-05-13 01:02
Severity ?
Details
An issue was discovered in Tcpreplay 4.3.1. An invalid memory access occurs in do_checksum in checksum.c. It can be triggered by sending a crafted pcap file to the tcpreplay-edit binary. It allows an attacker to cause a Denial of Service (Segmentation fault) or possibly have unspecified other impact.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2019-8381", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-119", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2019-02-17T02:29:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "An issue was discovered in Tcpreplay 4.3.1. An invalid memory access occurs in do_checksum in checksum.c. It can be triggered by sending a crafted pcap file to the tcpreplay-edit binary. It allows an attacker to cause a Denial of Service (Segmentation fault) or possibly have unspecified other impact.", id: "GHSA-2rfp-698j-hfvq", modified: "2022-05-13T01:02:41Z", published: "2022-05-13T01:02:41Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-8381", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/appneta/tcpreplay/issues/538", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4V3SADKXUSHWTVAPU3WLXBDEQUHRA6ZO", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/EB3ASS7URTIA3IFSBL2DIWJAFKTBJCAW", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MLPY6W7Z7G6PF2JN4LXXHCACYLD4RBG6", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://research.loginsoft.com/bugs/invalid-memory-access-vulnerability-in-function-do_checksum-tcpreplay-4-3-1", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.