ghsa-2qf2-98wp-cwm9
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 05:31
Modified
2022-05-17 05:31
Details
OpenSSL before 0.9.8j, when SSL_OP_NETSCAPE_REUSE_CIPHER_CHANGE_BUG is enabled, does not prevent modification of the ciphersuite in the session cache, which allows remote attackers to force the use of a disabled cipher via vectors involving sniffing network traffic to discover a session identifier, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-4180.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2008-7270" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2010-12-06T22:30:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "OpenSSL before 0.9.8j, when SSL_OP_NETSCAPE_REUSE_CIPHER_CHANGE_BUG is enabled, does not prevent modification of the ciphersuite in the session cache, which allows remote attackers to force the use of a disabled cipher via vectors involving sniffing network traffic to discover a session identifier, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-4180.", "id": "GHSA-2qf2-98wp-cwm9", "modified": "2022-05-17T05:31:07Z", "published": "2022-05-17T05:31:07Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-7270" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659462" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=17489" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=132077688910227\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/42493" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://ubuntu.com/usn/usn-1029-1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0977.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0978.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0896.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/522176" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/45254" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.