ghsa-2pw7-5gjq-98f6
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-10-23 18:31
Modified
2025-10-23 18:31
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Tibbo AggreGate Network Manager < 6.40.05 contains an observable response discrepancy in its login functionality. Authentication failure messages differ based on whether a supplied username exists or not, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to infer valid account identifiers. This can facilitate user enumeration and increase the likelihood of targeted brute-force or credential-stuffing attacks.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-34155"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-204"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-10-23T17:15:36Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Tibbo AggreGate Network Manager \u003c 6.40.05 contains an observable response discrepancy in its login functionality. Authentication failure messages differ based on whether a supplied username exists or not, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to infer valid account identifiers. This can facilitate user enumeration and increase the likelihood of targeted brute-force or credential-stuffing attacks.",
"id": "GHSA-2pw7-5gjq-98f6",
"modified": "2025-10-23T18:31:15Z",
"published": "2025-10-23T18:31:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-34155"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://aggregate.digital/downloads.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://aggregate.digital/products/network-manager.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/tibbo-aggregate-network-manager-login-functionality-user-enumeration"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…