ghsa-2mcr-985f-frgr
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-29 02:58
Modified
2022-04-29 02:58
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Buffer overflow in LHA allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via long pathnames in LHarc format 2 headers for a .LHZ archive, as originally demonstrated using the "x" option but also exploitable through "l" and "v", and fixed in header.c, a different issue than CVE-2004-0771.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2004-0769"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2004-08-18T04:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Buffer overflow in LHA allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via long pathnames in LHarc format 2 headers for a .LHZ archive, as originally demonstrated using the \"x\" option but also exploitable through \"l\" and \"v\", and fixed in header.c, a different issue than CVE-2004-0771.",
"id": "GHSA-2mcr-985f-frgr",
"modified": "2022-04-29T02:58:20Z",
"published": "2022-04-29T02:58:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2004-0769"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1833"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/16917"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A11047"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51285"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lw.ftw.zamosc.pl/lha-exploit.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=108745217504379\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200409-13.xml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2004-323.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2004-440.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…