GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-2JCW-RXCR-PWMP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-07-15 09:36 – Updated: 2025-11-04 00:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

tcp: avoid too many retransmit packets

If a TCP socket is using TCP_USER_TIMEOUT, and the other peer retracted its window to zero, tcp_retransmit_timer() can retransmit a packet every two jiffies (2 ms for HZ=1000), for about 4 minutes after TCP_USER_TIMEOUT has 'expired'.

The fix is to make sure tcp_rtx_probe0_timed_out() takes icsk->icsk_user_timeout into account.

Before blamed commit, the socket would not timeout after icsk->icsk_user_timeout, but would use standard exponential backoff for the retransmits.

Also worth noting that before commit e89688e3e978 ("net: tcp: fix unexcepted socket die when snd_wnd is 0"), the issue would last 2 minutes instead of 4.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-41007"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-07-15T09:15:02Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ntcp: avoid too many retransmit packets\n\nIf a TCP socket is using TCP_USER_TIMEOUT, and the other peer\nretracted its window to zero, tcp_retransmit_timer() can\nretransmit a packet every two jiffies (2 ms for HZ=1000),\nfor about 4 minutes after TCP_USER_TIMEOUT has \u0027expired\u0027.\n\nThe fix is to make sure tcp_rtx_probe0_timed_out() takes\nicsk-\u003eicsk_user_timeout into account.\n\nBefore blamed commit, the socket would not timeout after\nicsk-\u003eicsk_user_timeout, but would use standard exponential\nbackoff for the retransmits.\n\nAlso worth noting that before commit e89688e3e978 (\"net: tcp:\nfix unexcepted socket die when snd_wnd is 0\"), the issue\nwould last 2 minutes instead of 4.",
  "id": "GHSA-2jcw-rxcr-pwmp",
  "modified": "2025-11-04T00:30:58Z",
  "published": "2024-07-15T09:36:30Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41007"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/04317a2471c2f637b4c49cbd0e9c0d04a519f570"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5d7e64d70a11d988553a08239c810a658e841982"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/66cb64a1d2239cd0309f9b5038b05462570a5be1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7bb7670f92bfbd05fc41a8f9a8f358b7ffed65f4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/97a9063518f198ec0adb2ecb89789de342bb8283"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d2346fca5bed130dc712f276ac63450201d52969"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dfcdd7f89e401d2c6616be90c76c2fac3fa98fde"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e113cddefa27bbf5a79f72387b8fbd432a61a466"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…