ghsa-2cwg-9592-xc58
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-29 01:25
Modified
2022-04-29 01:25
Details

Heap-based buffer overflow in the NTLMSSP code for Ethereal 0.9.9 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2003-0159"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2003-04-02T05:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in the NTLMSSP code for Ethereal 0.9.9 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code.",
  "id": "GHSA-2cwg-9592-xc58",
  "modified": "2022-04-29T01:25:57Z",
  "published": "2022-04-29T01:25:57Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2003-0159"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A55"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=104741640924709\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ethereal.com/appnotes/enpa-sa-00008.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2003:051"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/2003_019_ethereal.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2003-077.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/7050"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.