GHSA-28XX-PPPM-VQFF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-30 18:21 – Updated: 2026-06-08 20:10Impact
Transactions were NOT committed despite the explicit options.WithCommit flag using table service client. Because of this, clients did not commit changes to the transaction, relying on the fact that the transaction commit was successful. This led (in rare cases) to a loss of data consistency.
Patches
ydb-go-sdk contains this problem in versions from v3.104.6 to v3.134.1. The fix for this problem has been released in version v3.134.2 (https://github.com/ydb-platform/ydb-go-sdk/pull/2091).
Workarounds
1) Use explicit table.Transaction.CommitTx(ctx) instead use options.WithCommit().
2) Use transaction retrier db.Table().DoTx(ctx, lambda) instead explicit start transaction on session.
3) Use query client db.Query().Do(ctx, lambda) with the same logic in lambda
Resources
Commit with bug https://github.com/ydb-platform/ydb-go-sdk/commit/251128a64763555d9a79ee7a131dd154c9000eb9 Commit with fix https://github.com/ydb-platform/ydb-go-sdk/commit/25dcff4c41153f1f9413512ba12999b40bf7154d
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 3.134.1"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/ydb-platform/ydb-go-sdk/v3"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "3.104.6"
},
{
"fixed": "3.134.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-670"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-30T18:21:04Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "### Impact\nTransactions were NOT committed despite the explicit `options.WithCommit` flag using table service client. Because of this, clients did not commit changes to the transaction, relying on the fact that the transaction commit was successful. This led (in rare cases) to a loss of data consistency.\n\n### Patches\n`ydb-go-sdk` contains this problem in versions from [v3.104.6](https://github.com/ydb-platform/ydb-go-sdk/releases/tag/v3.104.6) to [v3.134.1](https://github.com/ydb-platform/ydb-go-sdk/releases/tag/v3.134.1). The fix for this problem has been released in version [v3.134.2](https://github.com/ydb-platform/ydb-go-sdk/releases/tag/v3.134.2) (https://github.com/ydb-platform/ydb-go-sdk/pull/2091).\n\n### Workarounds\n1) Use explicit `table.Transaction.CommitTx(ctx)` instead use `options.WithCommit()`.\n2) Use transaction retrier `db.Table().DoTx(ctx, lambda)` instead explicit start transaction on session.\n3) Use query client `db.Query().Do(ctx, lambda)` with the same logic in `lambda`\n\n### Resources\nCommit with bug https://github.com/ydb-platform/ydb-go-sdk/commit/251128a64763555d9a79ee7a131dd154c9000eb9\nCommit with fix https://github.com/ydb-platform/ydb-go-sdk/commit/25dcff4c41153f1f9413512ba12999b40bf7154d",
"id": "GHSA-28xx-pppm-vqff",
"modified": "2026-06-08T20:10:28Z",
"published": "2026-04-30T18:21:04Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ydb-platform/ydb-go-sdk/security/advisories/GHSA-28xx-pppm-vqff"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ydb-platform/ydb-go-sdk/pull/2091"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ydb-platform/ydb-go-sdk/commit/251128a64763555d9a79ee7a131dd154c9000eb9"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ydb-platform/ydb-go-sdk/commit/25dcff4c41153f1f9413512ba12999b40bf7154d"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/ydb-platform/ydb-go-sdk"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ydb-platform/ydb-go-sdk/releases/tag/v3.104.6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ydb-platform/ydb-go-sdk/releases/tag/v3.134.1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ydb-platform/ydb-go-sdk/releases/tag/v3.134.2"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "ydb-go-sdk\u0027s transactions are not committed using the `options.WithCommit()` option on last call `table.Transaction.Execute` in transaction"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.