GHSA-27P3-V3FF-V3X4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 23:45 – Updated: 2022-05-01 23:45
VLAI
Details
Buffer overflow in Imager 0.42 through 0.63 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via an image based fill in which the number of input channels is different from the number of output channels.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2008-1928"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2008-04-24T05:05:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Buffer overflow in Imager 0.42 through 0.63 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via an image based fill in which the number of input channels is different from the number of output channels.",
"id": "GHSA-27p3-v3ff-v3x4",
"modified": "2022-05-01T23:45:01Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T23:45:01Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-1928"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/41986"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-April/msg00569.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://imager.perl.org/i/release064/Imager_0_64"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=35324"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/30011"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/30030"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/28980"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/1387/references"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…