GHSA-24M2-RCHH-H2MX

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-08 18:31 – Updated: 2026-06-08 18:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

drm/v3d: Reject empty multisync extension to prevent infinite loop

v3d_get_extensions() walks a userspace-provided singly-linked list of ioctl extensions without any bound on the chain length. A local user can craft a self-referential extension (ext->next == &ext) with zero in_sync_count and out_sync_count, which bypasses the existing duplicate- extension guard:

if (se->in_sync_count || se->out_sync_count)
        return -EINVAL;

The guard never fires because v3d_get_multisync_post_deps() returns immediately when count is zero, leaving both fields at zero on every iteration. The result is an infinite loop in kernel context, blocking the calling thread and pegging a CPU core indefinitely.

Fix this by rejecting a multisync extension where both in_sync_count and out_sync_count are zero in v3d_get_multisync_submit_deps(). An empty multisync carries no synchronization information and serves no useful purpose, so returning -EINVAL for such an extension is the correct defense against this attack vector.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-46314"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-08T17:16:50Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/v3d: Reject empty multisync extension to prevent infinite loop\n\nv3d_get_extensions() walks a userspace-provided singly-linked list of\nioctl extensions without any bound on the chain length. A local user\ncan craft a self-referential extension (ext-\u003enext == \u0026ext) with zero\nin_sync_count and out_sync_count, which bypasses the existing duplicate-\nextension guard:\n\n    if (se-\u003ein_sync_count || se-\u003eout_sync_count)\n            return -EINVAL;\n\nThe guard never fires because v3d_get_multisync_post_deps() returns\nimmediately when count is zero, leaving both fields at zero on every\niteration. The result is an infinite loop in kernel context, blocking\nthe calling thread and pegging a CPU core indefinitely.\n\nFix this by rejecting a multisync extension where both in_sync_count\nand out_sync_count are zero in v3d_get_multisync_submit_deps(). An\nempty multisync carries no synchronization information and serves no\nuseful purpose, so returning -EINVAL for such an extension is the\ncorrect defense against this attack vector.",
  "id": "GHSA-24m2-rchh-h2mx",
  "modified": "2026-06-08T18:31:53Z",
  "published": "2026-06-08T18:31:53Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-46314"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4fa42a249e8cd6ed17aea04e5695b6e9001f2433"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9c5164781cb388d219d8f49fa0f0b04cf86ad544"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fb44d589bf3148e13452185a6e772a7efbf2d684"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…