GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

FKIE_CVE-2026-9092

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-05-28 17:16 - Updated: 2026-06-17 11:04
Summary
Casdoor versions 2.362.0 and earlier contain a vulnerability involving unverified email binding that may enable account takeover. The getExistUserByBindingRule function matches users by email without checking the email_verified claim from upstream providers; the idp.UserInfo struct does not even include a EmailVerified field. An attacker can supply an unverified email claim from an upstream provider to take over accounts that use the same email address.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "product": "Casdoor",
          "vendor": "Casdoor",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "2.362.0",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "cret@cert.org"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Casdoor versions 2.362.0 and earlier contain a vulnerability involving unverified email binding that may enable account takeover. The getExistUserByBindingRule function matches users by email without checking the email_verified claim from upstream providers; the idp.UserInfo struct does not even include a EmailVerified field. An attacker can supply an unverified email claim from an upstream provider to take over accounts that use the same email address."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-9092",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T11:04:49.057",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 9.1,
          "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 5.2,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-9092",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "yes"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "total"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-06-01T16:56:52.782321Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-05-28T17:16:34.083",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cret@cert.org",
      "url": "https://kb.cert.org/vuls/id/780781"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cret@cert.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…