FKIE_CVE-2026-56866
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-10-08 23:17 - Updated: 2026-10-09 16:35
Severity
Summary
When http.Transport sends an HTTP/1 CONNECT request with a non-empty Request.Body, it writes the body directly to the connection without framing after the request headers. If the server rejects the CONNECT request with a non-2xx keep-alive response, Transport returns the connection to the idle pool. Because CONNECT requests do not have a request body, the server may interpret the trailing body bytes as a subsequent pipelined HTTP/1.1 request on the connection, leaving the pooled connection desynchronized and causing the next caller that reuses it to read the response to the injected request. In reverse proxies (including httputil.ReverseProxy) that forward CONNECT requests through a shared Transport, this can lead to cross-user response poisoning.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://pkg.go.dev",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "net/http",
"product": "net/http",
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "persistConn.readLoop"
},
{
"name": "Client.CloseIdleConnections"
},
{
"name": "Client.Do"
},
{
"name": "Client.Get"
},
{
"name": "Client.Head"
},
{
"name": "Client.Post"
},
{
"name": "Client.PostForm"
},
{
"name": "ClientConn.Close"
},
{
"name": "ClientConn.RoundTrip"
},
{
"name": "Get"
},
{
"name": "Head"
},
{
"name": "Post"
},
{
"name": "PostForm"
},
{
"name": "Transport.CloseIdleConnections"
},
{
"name": "Transport.NewClientConn"
},
{
"name": "Transport.RoundTrip"
},
{
"name": "http1ClientConn.Close"
},
{
"name": "http1ClientConn.RoundTrip"
}
],
"vendor": "Go standard library",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.26.9",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.27.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.27.0-0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://pkg.go.dev",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "net/http/httputil",
"product": "net/http/httputil",
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "ReverseProxy.ServeHTTP"
},
{
"name": "DumpRequestOut"
}
],
"vendor": "Go standard library",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.26.9",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.27.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.27.0-0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security@golang.org"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "When http.Transport sends an HTTP/1 CONNECT request with a non-empty Request.Body, it writes the body directly to the connection without framing after the request headers. If the server rejects the CONNECT request with a non-2xx keep-alive response, Transport returns the connection to the idle pool. Because CONNECT requests do not have a request body, the server may interpret the trailing body bytes as a subsequent pipelined HTTP/1.1 request on the connection, leaving the pooled connection desynchronized and causing the next caller that reuses it to read the response to the injected request. In reverse proxies (including httputil.ReverseProxy) that forward CONNECT requests through a shared Transport, this can lead to cross-user response poisoning."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-56866",
"lastModified": "2026-10-09T16:35:35.900",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-56866",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "yes"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-09T15:53:00.591143Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-10-08T23:17:01.620",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@golang.org",
"url": "https://go.dev/cl/847306"
},
{
"source": "security@golang.org",
"url": "https://go.dev/issue/81740"
},
{
"source": "security@golang.org",
"url": "https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/U2fTuyDJznI"
},
{
"source": "security@golang.org",
"url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2026-6605"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@golang.org",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-444"
}
],
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…