GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

FKIE_CVE-2026-4434

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-03-20 13:16 - Updated: 2026-06-17 10:56
Summary
Improper certificate validation in the PAM propagation WinRM connections allows a network attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack via disabled TLS certificate verification.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
devolutions devolutions_server *

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Server",
          "vendor": "Devolutions",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "2026.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@devolutions.net"
    }
  ],
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:devolutions:devolutions_server:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "53FC3C38-3A6C-4AE1-B2CA-10B238EE6BE1",
              "versionEndExcluding": "2026.1.6.0",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Improper certificate validation in the PAM propagation WinRM connections\n allows a network attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack via \ndisabled TLS certificate verification."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "La validaci\u00f3n de certificado incorrecta en las conexiones WinRM de propagaci\u00f3n de PAM permite a un atacante de red realizar un ataque man-in-the-middle a trav\u00e9s de la verificaci\u00f3n de certificado TLS deshabilitada."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-4434",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T10:56:33.950",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 8.1,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-4434",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "total"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-03-23T14:11:59.346311Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-03-20T13:16:13.043",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@devolutions.net",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://devolutions.net/security/advisories/DEVO-2026-0005/"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@devolutions.net",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-295"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@devolutions.net",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…