GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

FKIE_CVE-2025-9042

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-08-14 15:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 10:08
Summary
A security issue exists due to improper handling of CIP Class 32’s request when a module is inhibited on the 5094-IY8 device. It causes the module to enter a fault state with the Module LED flashing red. Upon un-inhibiting, the module returns a connection fault (Code 16#0010), and the module cannot recover without a power cycle.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "FLEX 5000 I/O",
          "vendor": "Rockwell Automation",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "Version 2.011 or below"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "PSIRT@rockwellautomation.com"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "A security issue exists due to improper handling of CIP Class 32\u2019s request when a module is inhibited on the 5094-IY8 device. It causes the module to enter a fault state with the Module LED flashing red. Upon un-inhibiting, the module returns a connection fault (Code 16#0010), and the module cannot recover without a power cycle."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Existe un problema de seguridad debido a la gesti\u00f3n incorrecta de la solicitud de CIP Clase 32 cuando un m\u00f3dulo est\u00e1 inhibido en el dispositivo 5094-IY8. Esto provoca que el m\u00f3dulo entre en estado de fallo con el LED del m\u00f3dulo parpadeando en rojo. Al desinhibirse, el m\u00f3dulo devuelve un fallo de conexi\u00f3n (C\u00f3digo 16#0010) y no puede recuperarse sin apagar y encender."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-9042",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T10:08:12.530",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV40": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackRequirements": "NONE",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "baseScore": 8.7,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
          "version": "4.0",
          "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
          "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
        },
        "source": "PSIRT@rockwellautomation.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2025-9042",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "yes"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2025-08-14T14:51:36.300478Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-08-14T15:15:45.263",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "PSIRT@rockwellautomation.com",
      "url": "https://www.rockwellautomation.com/en-us/trust-center/security-advisories/advisory.SD1737.html"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "PSIRT@rockwellautomation.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-1287"
        }
      ],
      "source": "PSIRT@rockwellautomation.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…