fkie_cve-2025-52968
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-06-23 15:15
Modified
2025-06-23 20:16
Severity ?
Summary
xdg-open in xdg-utils through 1.2.1 can send requests containing SameSite=Strict cookies, which can facilitate CSRF. (For example, xdg-open could be modified to, by default, associate x-scheme-handler/https with the execution of a browser with command-line options that arrange for an empty cookie store, although this would add substantial complexity, and would not be considered a desirable or expected behavior by all users.) NOTE: this is disputed because integrations of xdg-open typically do not provide information about whether the xdg-open command and arguments were manually entered by a user, or whether they were the result of a navigation from content in an untrusted origin.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"cveTags": [
{
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"disputed"
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "xdg-open in xdg-utils through 1.2.1 can send requests containing SameSite=Strict cookies, which can facilitate CSRF. (For example, xdg-open could be modified to, by default, associate x-scheme-handler/https with the execution of a browser with command-line options that arrange for an empty cookie store, although this would add substantial complexity, and would not be considered a desirable or expected behavior by all users.) NOTE: this is disputed because integrations of xdg-open typically do not provide information about whether the xdg-open command and arguments were manually entered by a user, or whether they were the result of a navigation from content in an untrusted origin."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "xdg-open en xdg-utils hasta la versi\u00f3n 1.2.1 puede enviar solicitudes que contienen cookies SameSite=Strict, lo que facilita el CSRF. (Por ejemplo, xdg-open podr\u00eda modificarse para asociar, por defecto, x-scheme-handler/https con la ejecuci\u00f3n de un navegador con opciones de l\u00ednea de comandos que gestionen un almac\u00e9n de cookies vac\u00edo, aunque esto a\u00f1adir\u00eda una complejidad considerable y no ser\u00eda considerado un comportamiento deseable ni esperado por todos los usuarios). NOTA: Esto es controvertido porque las integraciones de xdg-open no suelen proporcionar informaci\u00f3n sobre si el comando y los argumentos de xdg-open fueron introducidos manualmente por un usuario o si fueron el resultado de una navegaci\u00f3n desde contenido de un origen no confiable."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-52968",
"lastModified": "2025-06-23T20:16:21.633",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 2.7,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.0,
"impactScore": 1.4,
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2025-06-23T15:15:29.350",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "https://cgit.freedesktop.org/xdg/xdg-utils/tag/?h=v1.2.1"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/06/23/1"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-420"
}
],
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…