FKIE_CVE-2025-43930

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-07-07 15:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 09:24
Severity
9.8 (Critical) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Summary
Hashview 0.8.1 allows account takeover via the password reset feature because SERVER_NAME is not configured and thus a reset depends on the Host HTTP header.
References
cve@mitre.orghttps://github.com/hashview/hashview/blob/579a082176279f4af0e128e44c9da5667f82ec5a/hashview/users/routes.py#L198-L218
cve@mitre.orghttps://github.com/hashview/hashview/issues/145
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "cve@mitre.org"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Hashview 0.8.1 allows account takeover via the password reset feature because SERVER_NAME is not configured and thus a reset depends on the Host HTTP header."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Hashview 0.8.1 permite la toma de control de cuentas a trav\u00e9s de la funci\u00f3n de restablecimiento de contrase\u00f1a porque SERVER_NAME no est\u00e1 configurado y, por lo tanto, un restablecimiento depende del encabezado HTTP del Host."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-43930",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T09:24:45.987",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 9.8,
          "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2025-43930",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "yes"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "total"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2025-07-07T19:44:32.970115Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-07-07T15:15:26.733",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://github.com/hashview/hashview/blob/579a082176279f4af0e128e44c9da5667f82ec5a/hashview/users/routes.py#L198-L218"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://github.com/hashview/hashview/issues/145"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-472"
        }
      ],
      "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.