fkie_cve-2025-40118
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-11-12 11:15
Modified
2025-11-12 16:19
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: pm80xx: Fix array-index-out-of-of-bounds on rmmod
Since commit f7b705c238d1 ("scsi: pm80xx: Set phy_attached to zero when
device is gone") UBSAN reports:
UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c:786:17
index 28 is out of range for type 'pm8001_phy [16]'
on rmmod when using an expander.
For a direct attached device, attached_phy contains the local phy id.
For a device behind an expander, attached_phy contains the remote phy
id, not the local phy id.
I.e. while pm8001_ha will have pm8001_ha->chip->n_phy local phys, for a
device behind an expander, attached_phy can be much larger than
pm8001_ha->chip->n_phy (depending on the amount of phys of the
expander).
E.g. on my system pm8001_ha has 8 phys with phy ids 0-7. One of the
ports has an expander connected. The expander has 31 phys with phy ids
0-30.
The pm8001_ha->phy array only contains the phys of the HBA. It does not
contain the phys of the expander. Thus, it is wrong to use attached_phy
to index the pm8001_ha->phy array for a device behind an expander.
Thus, we can only clear phy_attached for devices that are directly
attached.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nscsi: pm80xx: Fix array-index-out-of-of-bounds on rmmod\n\nSince commit f7b705c238d1 (\"scsi: pm80xx: Set phy_attached to zero when\ndevice is gone\") UBSAN reports:\n\n UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c:786:17\n index 28 is out of range for type \u0027pm8001_phy [16]\u0027\n\non rmmod when using an expander.\n\nFor a direct attached device, attached_phy contains the local phy id.\nFor a device behind an expander, attached_phy contains the remote phy\nid, not the local phy id.\n\nI.e. while pm8001_ha will have pm8001_ha-\u003echip-\u003en_phy local phys, for a\ndevice behind an expander, attached_phy can be much larger than\npm8001_ha-\u003echip-\u003en_phy (depending on the amount of phys of the\nexpander).\n\nE.g. on my system pm8001_ha has 8 phys with phy ids 0-7. One of the\nports has an expander connected. The expander has 31 phys with phy ids\n0-30.\n\nThe pm8001_ha-\u003ephy array only contains the phys of the HBA. It does not\ncontain the phys of the expander. Thus, it is wrong to use attached_phy\nto index the pm8001_ha-\u003ephy array for a device behind an expander.\n\nThus, we can only clear phy_attached for devices that are directly\nattached."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-40118",
"lastModified": "2025-11-12T16:19:12.850",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2025-11-12T11:15:41.117",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/251be2f6037fb7ab399f68cd7428ff274133d693"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/45acbf154befedd9bc135f5e031fe7855d1e6493"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/83ced3c206c292458e47c7fac54223abc7141585"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9326a1541e1b7ed3efdbab72061b82cf01c6477a"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9c671d4dbfbfb0d73cfdfb706afb36d9ad60a582"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d94be0a6ae9ade706d4270e740bdb4f79953a7fc"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e62251954a128a2d0fcbc19e5fa39e08935bb628"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eef5ef400893f8e3dbb09342583be0cdc716d566"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…