fkie_cve-2025-39723
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-09-05 18:15
Modified
2025-09-08 16:25
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfs: Fix unbuffered write error handling
If all the subrequests in an unbuffered write stream fail, the subrequest
collector doesn't update the stream->transferred value and it retains its
initial LONG_MAX value. Unfortunately, if all active streams fail, then we
take the smallest value of { LONG_MAX, LONG_MAX, ... } as the value to set
in wreq->transferred - which is then returned from ->write_iter().
LONG_MAX was chosen as the initial value so that all the streams can be
quickly assessed by taking the smallest value of all stream->transferred -
but this only works if we've set any of them.
Fix this by adding a flag to indicate whether the value in
stream->transferred is valid and checking that when we integrate the
values. stream->transferred can then be initialised to zero.
This was found by running the generic/750 xfstest against cifs with
cache=none. It splices data to the target file. Once (if) it has used up
all the available scratch space, the writes start failing with ENOSPC.
This causes ->write_iter() to fail. However, it was returning
wreq->transferred, i.e. LONG_MAX, rather than an error (because it thought
the amount transferred was non-zero) and iter_file_splice_write() would
then try to clean up that amount of pipe bufferage - leading to an oops
when it overran. The kernel log showed:
CIFS: VFS: Send error in write = -28
followed by:
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008
with:
RIP: 0010:iter_file_splice_write+0x3a4/0x520
do_splice+0x197/0x4e0
or:
RIP: 0010:pipe_buf_release (include/linux/pipe_fs_i.h:282)
iter_file_splice_write (fs/splice.c:755)
Also put a warning check into splice to announce if ->write_iter() returned
that it had written more than it was asked to.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version |
---|
{ "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetfs: Fix unbuffered write error handling\n\nIf all the subrequests in an unbuffered write stream fail, the subrequest\ncollector doesn\u0027t update the stream-\u003etransferred value and it retains its\ninitial LONG_MAX value. Unfortunately, if all active streams fail, then we\ntake the smallest value of { LONG_MAX, LONG_MAX, ... } as the value to set\nin wreq-\u003etransferred - which is then returned from -\u003ewrite_iter().\n\nLONG_MAX was chosen as the initial value so that all the streams can be\nquickly assessed by taking the smallest value of all stream-\u003etransferred -\nbut this only works if we\u0027ve set any of them.\n\nFix this by adding a flag to indicate whether the value in\nstream-\u003etransferred is valid and checking that when we integrate the\nvalues. stream-\u003etransferred can then be initialised to zero.\n\nThis was found by running the generic/750 xfstest against cifs with\ncache=none. It splices data to the target file. Once (if) it has used up\nall the available scratch space, the writes start failing with ENOSPC.\nThis causes -\u003ewrite_iter() to fail. However, it was returning\nwreq-\u003etransferred, i.e. LONG_MAX, rather than an error (because it thought\nthe amount transferred was non-zero) and iter_file_splice_write() would\nthen try to clean up that amount of pipe bufferage - leading to an oops\nwhen it overran. The kernel log showed:\n\n CIFS: VFS: Send error in write = -28\n\nfollowed by:\n\n BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008\n\nwith:\n\n RIP: 0010:iter_file_splice_write+0x3a4/0x520\n do_splice+0x197/0x4e0\n\nor:\n\n RIP: 0010:pipe_buf_release (include/linux/pipe_fs_i.h:282)\n iter_file_splice_write (fs/splice.c:755)\n\nAlso put a warning check into splice to announce if -\u003ewrite_iter() returned\nthat it had written more than it was asked to." } ], "id": "CVE-2025-39723", "lastModified": "2025-09-08T16:25:38.810", "metrics": {}, "published": "2025-09-05T18:15:50.043", "references": [ { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/387164a2b97e1f5404c6d0049a7409bac7d2bc5b" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a3de58b12ce074ec05b8741fa28d62ccb1070468" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f08c80af3c9a9849cd178b4843b7c01d103506a1" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis" }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…