CVE-2025-39723 (GCVE-0-2025-39723)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-09-05 17:21
Modified
2025-09-29 05:58
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfs: Fix unbuffered write error handling
If all the subrequests in an unbuffered write stream fail, the subrequest
collector doesn't update the stream->transferred value and it retains its
initial LONG_MAX value. Unfortunately, if all active streams fail, then we
take the smallest value of { LONG_MAX, LONG_MAX, ... } as the value to set
in wreq->transferred - which is then returned from ->write_iter().
LONG_MAX was chosen as the initial value so that all the streams can be
quickly assessed by taking the smallest value of all stream->transferred -
but this only works if we've set any of them.
Fix this by adding a flag to indicate whether the value in
stream->transferred is valid and checking that when we integrate the
values. stream->transferred can then be initialised to zero.
This was found by running the generic/750 xfstest against cifs with
cache=none. It splices data to the target file. Once (if) it has used up
all the available scratch space, the writes start failing with ENOSPC.
This causes ->write_iter() to fail. However, it was returning
wreq->transferred, i.e. LONG_MAX, rather than an error (because it thought
the amount transferred was non-zero) and iter_file_splice_write() would
then try to clean up that amount of pipe bufferage - leading to an oops
when it overran. The kernel log showed:
CIFS: VFS: Send error in write = -28
followed by:
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008
with:
RIP: 0010:iter_file_splice_write+0x3a4/0x520
do_splice+0x197/0x4e0
or:
RIP: 0010:pipe_buf_release (include/linux/pipe_fs_i.h:282)
iter_file_splice_write (fs/splice.c:755)
Also put a warning check into splice to announce if ->write_iter() returned
that it had written more than it was asked to.
References
Impacted products
{ "containers": { "cna": { "affected": [ { "defaultStatus": "unaffected", "product": "Linux", "programFiles": [ "fs/netfs/read_collect.c", "fs/netfs/write_collect.c", "fs/netfs/write_issue.c", "fs/splice.c", "include/linux/netfs.h" ], "repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git", "vendor": "Linux", "versions": [ { "lessThan": "f08c80af3c9a9849cd178b4843b7c01d103506a1", "status": "affected", "version": "288ace2f57c9d06dd2e42bd80d03747d879a4068", "versionType": "git" }, { "lessThan": "387164a2b97e1f5404c6d0049a7409bac7d2bc5b", "status": "affected", "version": "288ace2f57c9d06dd2e42bd80d03747d879a4068", "versionType": "git" }, { "lessThan": "a3de58b12ce074ec05b8741fa28d62ccb1070468", "status": "affected", "version": "288ace2f57c9d06dd2e42bd80d03747d879a4068", "versionType": "git" } ] }, { "defaultStatus": "affected", "product": "Linux", "programFiles": [ "fs/netfs/read_collect.c", "fs/netfs/write_collect.c", "fs/netfs/write_issue.c", "fs/splice.c", "include/linux/netfs.h" ], "repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git", "vendor": "Linux", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "6.10" }, { "lessThan": "6.10", "status": "unaffected", "version": "0", "versionType": "semver" }, { "lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*", "status": "unaffected", "version": "6.12.44", "versionType": "semver" }, { "lessThanOrEqual": "6.16.*", "status": "unaffected", "version": "6.16.4", "versionType": "semver" }, { "lessThanOrEqual": "*", "status": "unaffected", "version": "6.17", "versionType": "original_commit_for_fix" } ] } ], "cpeApplicability": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "versionEndExcluding": "6.12.44", "versionStartIncluding": "6.10", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "versionEndExcluding": "6.16.4", "versionStartIncluding": "6.10", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "versionEndExcluding": "6.17", "versionStartIncluding": "6.10", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetfs: Fix unbuffered write error handling\n\nIf all the subrequests in an unbuffered write stream fail, the subrequest\ncollector doesn\u0027t update the stream-\u003etransferred value and it retains its\ninitial LONG_MAX value. Unfortunately, if all active streams fail, then we\ntake the smallest value of { LONG_MAX, LONG_MAX, ... } as the value to set\nin wreq-\u003etransferred - which is then returned from -\u003ewrite_iter().\n\nLONG_MAX was chosen as the initial value so that all the streams can be\nquickly assessed by taking the smallest value of all stream-\u003etransferred -\nbut this only works if we\u0027ve set any of them.\n\nFix this by adding a flag to indicate whether the value in\nstream-\u003etransferred is valid and checking that when we integrate the\nvalues. stream-\u003etransferred can then be initialised to zero.\n\nThis was found by running the generic/750 xfstest against cifs with\ncache=none. It splices data to the target file. Once (if) it has used up\nall the available scratch space, the writes start failing with ENOSPC.\nThis causes -\u003ewrite_iter() to fail. However, it was returning\nwreq-\u003etransferred, i.e. LONG_MAX, rather than an error (because it thought\nthe amount transferred was non-zero) and iter_file_splice_write() would\nthen try to clean up that amount of pipe bufferage - leading to an oops\nwhen it overran. The kernel log showed:\n\n CIFS: VFS: Send error in write = -28\n\nfollowed by:\n\n BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008\n\nwith:\n\n RIP: 0010:iter_file_splice_write+0x3a4/0x520\n do_splice+0x197/0x4e0\n\nor:\n\n RIP: 0010:pipe_buf_release (include/linux/pipe_fs_i.h:282)\n iter_file_splice_write (fs/splice.c:755)\n\nAlso put a warning check into splice to announce if -\u003ewrite_iter() returned\nthat it had written more than it was asked to." } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2025-09-29T05:58:10.575Z", "orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "shortName": "Linux" }, "references": [ { "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f08c80af3c9a9849cd178b4843b7c01d103506a1" }, { "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/387164a2b97e1f5404c6d0049a7409bac7d2bc5b" }, { "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a3de58b12ce074ec05b8741fa28d62ccb1070468" } ], "title": "netfs: Fix unbuffered write error handling", "x_generator": { "engine": "bippy-1.2.0" } } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "assignerShortName": "Linux", "cveId": "CVE-2025-39723", "datePublished": "2025-09-05T17:21:31.137Z", "dateReserved": "2025-04-16T07:20:57.117Z", "dateUpdated": "2025-09-29T05:58:10.575Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "vulnerability-lookup:meta": { "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-39723\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"published\":\"2025-09-05T18:15:50.043\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-09-08T16:25:38.810\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\\n\\nnetfs: Fix unbuffered write error handling\\n\\nIf all the subrequests in an unbuffered write stream fail, the subrequest\\ncollector doesn\u0027t update the stream-\u003etransferred value and it retains its\\ninitial LONG_MAX value. Unfortunately, if all active streams fail, then we\\ntake the smallest value of { LONG_MAX, LONG_MAX, ... } as the value to set\\nin wreq-\u003etransferred - which is then returned from -\u003ewrite_iter().\\n\\nLONG_MAX was chosen as the initial value so that all the streams can be\\nquickly assessed by taking the smallest value of all stream-\u003etransferred -\\nbut this only works if we\u0027ve set any of them.\\n\\nFix this by adding a flag to indicate whether the value in\\nstream-\u003etransferred is valid and checking that when we integrate the\\nvalues. stream-\u003etransferred can then be initialised to zero.\\n\\nThis was found by running the generic/750 xfstest against cifs with\\ncache=none. It splices data to the target file. Once (if) it has used up\\nall the available scratch space, the writes start failing with ENOSPC.\\nThis causes -\u003ewrite_iter() to fail. However, it was returning\\nwreq-\u003etransferred, i.e. LONG_MAX, rather than an error (because it thought\\nthe amount transferred was non-zero) and iter_file_splice_write() would\\nthen try to clean up that amount of pipe bufferage - leading to an oops\\nwhen it overran. The kernel log showed:\\n\\n CIFS: VFS: Send error in write = -28\\n\\nfollowed by:\\n\\n BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008\\n\\nwith:\\n\\n RIP: 0010:iter_file_splice_write+0x3a4/0x520\\n do_splice+0x197/0x4e0\\n\\nor:\\n\\n RIP: 0010:pipe_buf_release (include/linux/pipe_fs_i.h:282)\\n iter_file_splice_write (fs/splice.c:755)\\n\\nAlso put a warning check into splice to announce if -\u003ewrite_iter() returned\\nthat it had written more than it was asked to.\"}],\"metrics\":{},\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/387164a2b97e1f5404c6d0049a7409bac7d2bc5b\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\"},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a3de58b12ce074ec05b8741fa28d62ccb1070468\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\"},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f08c80af3c9a9849cd178b4843b7c01d103506a1\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\"}]}}" } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…